Evidence of Corruption in Clark County Sent to Governor Inslee per His Request

snakesinsuits

 

Dear Friends,

I will be publishing all of my submissions of evidence of corruption in Clark County sent to Governor Inslee per his own request and per the request of a member of his election committee prior to his election. I will let the readers conclude if he was given hard evidence (document files were attached always) that he has refused to report and act upon per his duty under 18 USC 4 Misprision of a Felony and 73 Obstruction of Justice, as well as dereliction of duty…

Here is all I ever get or got back in response:

I will be working actively against his re-election and Inslee will be named in civil litigation for a long list of torts and I believe crimes as wll

Jim

Next week in Vancouver with Governor Inslee

Dear James,

Thank you for your continued support of Governor Inslee! I am writing today to follow up on a message from the Governor, inviting you to join us for a garden party in Vancouver next Thursday at the home of Jane and Paul Jacobsen. We’d love to see you for a gathering of friends and an opportunity to discuss the Governor’s work in Olympia and our plans moving forward to 2016.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if you can join us!

Best regards,
Seamus

Seamus

Seamus McKeon

Jay Inslee for Washington

(206) 328-2969

seamus@jayinslee.com

Dear James,

With the long 2015 Legislative Session finally over, we have a great deal to be proud of. I hope you will join me in celebrating our accomplishments and help launch our reelection campaign. On Thursday, August 6, Jane and Paul Jacobsen are holding a party for me to discuss the successes from this legislative session and the major issues still facing our state and nation.

There is no doubt this session was tough, but after a long fight and three special sessions, we made important progress on critical issues facing our state. We fought for and secured $1.3 billion in new education funding – the largest additional investment ever. We are reducing class sizes in kindergarten through third grade, where it matters most; we secured funding for all day kindergarten; and we will make a historic investment in early childhood education.

We are also reducing tuition at all public colleges and universities in our state and making a 16-year, $16 billion investment in transportation which will create tens of thousands of jobs and begin to fix the gridlock that has been paralyzing our communities.

This budget agreement is important to the future prosperity and success of our great state.

But there is still more work to be done, and I can’t do it without you. The Republicans blocked us on many key issues; it’s more important now than ever to keep up the fight. I hope you can join me to celebrate our accomplishments and discuss our strategies to keep Washington moving forward:

Garden Party for Governor Inslee

Thursday, August 6 from 5:30 to 7:00 PM

At the home of Jane and Paul Jacobsen

703 E Reserve St. | Vancouver, Washington

$1000 Co-Host, $500 Sponsor, $250 Friend, $100 Guest

RSVP to Seamus McKeon | seamus@JayInslee.com | (206) 328-2969

www.JayInslee.com/Vancouver

Thank you for all that you do to help keep Washington State a great place to live, work, learn, and raise a family.

Very truly yours,

Jay Inslee

SENT TO GOVERNOR INSLEE’S OFFICE

Corruption in McKenna’s AG Office

Corruption is rampant in AG’s office see attached also see https://jimcraven10.wordpress.com see files on Clark College and attempts to report corruption obstructed including by McKenna and various law enforcement.

Jim Craven presently in China

From a letter and sworn testimony of Emma Kim formerly of Clark College HR

While I was an employee in Personnel, I was asked by Donna Kelly to engage in a task that involved the violation of Jim Craven’s civil and employee rights. The specific task was to send all his emails to the AG’s office. (Mind you, not Dennis Watson’s or anyone else’s emails, just Jim Craven’s stuff. For those of you who might be wondering what’s wrong with that, it is illegal to keep separate files on employees. It is also illegal to keep a separate file on anyone practicing their freedom of speech as a dissenter or activist.)

Secret file 6 binders, 4900 pages kept since 1994

For Jay Inslee eyes only AG McKenna Corruption FW: URGENT eyes only  For Head Judge WAC Div II Case No 49255-I-II
To: coa2filings@courts.wa.gov; dionnep@atg.wa.gov
Subject: URGENT eyes only For Head Judge WAC Div II Case No 49255-I-II
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:38:14 -0700

Dear Your Honor:

I am in China and had a heart attack again, here, will return Sept 1 and try best to meet 9-11 deadline for correction of defects of brief. Please read all do something about ESD garnishee of bank account of my daughther’s mother and daughter that had my name but no association on it.
Also my credit rating damaged. They are worried here I may not make it back to US alive thus this letter in case I don’t, This  is contempt for your Court as well. No need to cover-up or deny due process in a clean case only dirty one. The complete record of this case is in the hands of friends in case I do not make it. Please see pp 60-66 CR Pomeroy. Do we execute people with appeals pending? I beg you not for me but for my family, My wife is 8 months pregnant and I may not see my new child. As an Officer of the Court, member of Bar and human being do something whatever you think of the merits of my case this is a separate issue but related.

I swear under penalty of perjury all statements true  and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and that this is sent to ESD Counsel.

James Craven
Appellant pro se

Continue reading

Posted in CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, Faces of Fascism, Fascism in America, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Legal System Corruption, MSM Mainstream Media Sycophancy, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management | Leave a comment

When Will the Decent People in Vancouver Stand up to the Corruption in Clark County?

power 29c02e88-4a48-4456-89a6-48eb08b48c97-medium

http://1believe2obey3love4trust.blogspot.com/p/hmmmmmm.html

WOW, OUT OF THE OFFICE UNTIL MAY 20th?  2016?

THIS VPD RESPONSED  REQUIRES A NEWS RELEASE ALL OF ITS OWN.

KID YOU NOT!    WHO DO YOU, OR ANYONE IN YOUR GROUP KNOW IN THE NEWS INDUSTRY WHO WOULD LIKE TO RUN THIS BIT OF

 VPD EVASIVE ACTIONS, APPARENTLY TO AVOID A FOIA REQUEST.

 

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Traci Eccles <eccles.traci@gmail.com> wrote:

Well Sgt. Hatley…

Apparently Lt. Creager will be out of the office until May 20th?  is that 2016?  You received a copy of my request, but since I have only directed these questions to the VPD and not the City Attorneys Office, I am touching base with you to see if I should forward these questions elsewhere.  Thanks!

 

———- Forwarded message ———- From: Creager, Scott <Scott.Creager@cityofvancouver.us> Date: Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:13 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Lt. Creager: IMPORTANT To: Traci Eccles <eccles.traci@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until at least May 20th. I will respond to any e-mails shortly after my return.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact Sergeant Kevin Hatley at kevin.hatley@cityofvancouver.us or 487-7471.

My advice Traci, is thusly:   VPD  Lt. Scott Creager willful evasion/avoidance of responding to those certain FOIAs you have submitted, appears to be a deliberate act  on non-compliance in respect to those certain FOIAs, and to other FOIAs, which you have been submitting to VPD Lt. Creager.

Accordingly, my recommendation is that you file a COMPLAINT ASAP with the
U.S. Justice Dept., regarding this willful evasion/avoidance of VPD Lt. Scott Creager’s non-compliance with those certain FOIAS. File the FOIA COMPLAINT ASAP with the US Justice Dept. NOW! cc: Washington State AG.
Moreover, if there are other similar willfull evasions/avoidances of VPDs non-complaince with other FOIAs, my advice is that you file a COMPLAINT ASAP  with the U.s. Justice Dept, regarding this willful evasion/avoidance of VPD Lt. Scott Creager’s non-compliance, including the non-complaince of VPD Lt. Scott Creager’s  subordinates, with those certain FOIAS; and/or any other VPD FOIA was not responded to by VPD.
File the FOIA COMPLAINT ASAP with the US  Justice Dept. NOW!

cc: Washington State AG.
Same action should be considered if there are similar willful evasions/avoidances of Clark County’s Judical System with FOIAS that have not been responded to


1. in a timely manner;
2. lack of any response;
3. or resonse has been a willful evasion/avoidance by Clark County’s Judicial System.


File the FOIA  COMPLAINT ASAP with the US  Justice Dept. NOW!
cc: Washington State AG.


Any FOIA requests that have been willfully evaded and/or avoided by any Judicial System in Washington State, that have not been responded to
1. in a timely manner;
2. lack of any response;
3. or resonse has been a willful evasion/avoidance by that certain Judicial System in Washington State.


File the FOIA  COMPLAINT ASAP with the US  Justice Dept. NOW!

cc: Washington State AG.
Need assistance with this matter, let me know.
Regards, Judy

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Traci Eccles <eccles.traci@gmail.com> wrote:

Lt. Creager,

Based on your response from yesterday, I can only surmise that you habitually fail to read my emails past the first line or two. I will make this easy… and let’s just call it an official FOIA request:


1.  What training (if any) do law enforcement investigators with the VPD receive regarding their duty under Brady v. Maryland to notify the prosecutor of any potential exculpatory information discovered during an investigation?
2.  What policy does the VPD enforce from their departmental regulations requiring officers to disclose exculpatory evidence.  What penalties may result from non-compliance (provided there is such a policy enforced)?
Thank you.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Creager, Scott <Scott.Creager@cityofvancouver.us> wrote:
Dear Ms Eccles,

Unfortunately the e-mail you sent to me this morning contained no attachments, just the text below your explanation.  The purpose for my question to you was to establish when we received this request.  Fortunately Ms McJilton was able to quicky respond to both of us with the necessary information.  Here is a copy of the e-mail.

Scott Creager| Lieutenant
Valor, Professionalism, Duty
CITY OF VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON
Vancouver Police Department/Headquarters
W:(360) 487-7501

Scott.creager@cityofvancouver.us/      http://www.cityofvancouver.us
NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: This e-mail account is public domain. Any correspondence from or to this e-mail account may be a public record. Accordingly, this e-mail, in whole or in part may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56, regardless of any claim of confidentiality or privilege asserted by an external

From: Traci Eccles [mailto:eccles.traci@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:21 PM
To: Creager, Scott
Subject: Lt. Creager: IMPORTANT

Lt. Creager,

In reading your last email, it occurs to me that perhaps you are not taking the time to read beyond the introduction of my correspondences (if that).  Your question regarding this morning’sFOIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE REQUEST was unnecessary as I copied the request to the email sent to you, and I clearly stated that in the email. This would certainly explain the absence of any response from you regarding my request for information in an email dated July 15th and titled “Substantive due process issue”… I am still awaiting the response on that one.  Might I suggest you take a moment to read it now?

In the same category of concern, I have a few follow up questions regarding VPD policies and procedures regarding the altering and/or “back filling” of police reports after they have been stamped into record by the CCSO.  And no, I am not talking about supplemental reports… I am talking about multiple different versions of originals.

In exercising our rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Guy and I have discovered something important to our vindication, as well as that of Garrett Smith:  The truth will be revealed… if not through the ethical channels we had been hoping for, definitely through the barrage of inconsistency and outright falsification that has become the unavoidable by-product of repeated attempts on the part of various city and county entities to cover up the kind of egregious misconduct that has put us all in this position in the first place.

I will continue to wait for an informed response from you regarding my July 15th email Lt. Creager.  Thank you.

Traci Eccles, citizen of Clark County, Vancouver, WA

. Hatley,

Thank you for the detailed explanation regarding the reference case number (RCN). It’s obvious the failure to reference case number, V14-6772, as the RCN for V14-16534 was intentional. Officer Smarr, the alleged arresting officer, was able to hide the V14-16534 report as it was finally revealed on June 19, 2015 after multiple PDR’s since November 2014.

Brief Timeline:

May 7, 2014 V14-6772 False arrest – no probable cause unfounded and non existent -exonerated;  unlawful seizure of iPhone – violation of VPD evidence procedures, violations of civil rights.
PDR Received January 24, 2015

May 30, 2014 V14-6772 Failure to obtain authorization to issue an unlawful order – false BOLO
May 30, 2014 V14-6772 Failure to create supplemental electronic report for the alleged declaration of probable cause for arrest for misdemeanor cyberstalking with citation for arrest.
PDR Received April 22, 2015

Oct 24, 2014 V14-16534 False arrest – unauthorized BOLO for misdemeanor cyberstalking (V14-6772) – unfounded and dismissed, violation of VPD & CCSO BOLO procedures.
PDR Received June 19, 2015

Scoreboard:
May 7, 2014 false arrest, probable cause unfounded as it did not existent – exonerated  May 12, 2014
May 7, 2014 unlawful seizure of iPhone, failed to follow evidence handling procedures – adversely impact dept.’s image
May 30, 2014 knowingly issue an unauthorized and unlawful order – issuance of BOLO stated probable cause for misdemeanor citation for arrest; no probable cause or citation for arrest has been discovered via multiple public records requests.

Oct 24, 2014 false arrest per May 30, 2014 unauthorized & unlawful order – false BOLO

Nov 4, 2014 – Sgt Andy Hamlin issued BOLO based upon 3rd party hearsay from a meeting that never occurred stating Bini & Eccles had made death threats about a deputy prosecuting attorney, Jennifer Nugent, in a criminal case yet to be tried.

March 25, 2015 Aldridge discloses false, unredacted non-conviction criminal data into public record. The information above that has already been refuted.

April 2, 2015 – Sgt. Andy Hamlin escalates the Nov 4, 2014 BOLO to include all Law Enforcement Agencies in Clark County.

Over the last 15 months, the retaliation identified in the above timeline of events by Det. Aldridge and Sgt. Hamlin are clearly an abuse of authority used to intimidate defense witness and potential defense witness as well as place said defense witnesses in harm’s way.

RE: V14-6772 The faux investigation aka the attempted criminalization of Guido A. Bini by VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge and authorized by her immediate supervisor, Sgt. Andy Hamlin have violated the following VPD police & procedures. This list is by no means conclusive as the VPD may find additional violations not identified by the complainant.

Multiple violations of VPD Policy & Procedures:
Offense Class 5 d. Failure to comply with policies, orders, regulations when such violations involves the misuse or abuse of authority, or an ethical offense and/or creates a clear, serious adverse impact on public safety or the professional image of the dept. Release of FALSE non-conviction, unredacted criminal data into public records – March 25, 2015 (Bini & Eccles)

Offense Class 6 a. Failure to reply truthfully to any question or request for information in any investigation, hearing or procedure – 02/27/2014 depositions, when asked, Det. Aldridge stated she had no special training. However, during the 11/24/2014 evidentiary hearing (13-1-01035-6), Det. Aldridge Stated she was Cellbrite certified to use technology she had available at her desk to access smart phone devices. Det. Aldridge stated she had difficulty obtaining forensic evidence of J. Garrett Smith’s iPhone on July 15-16, 2013 and required the assistance of “Bruce” from the DECU to complete the downloading of all content on said iPhone. She may have destroyed well over 3,000 emails that were on said iPhone and are now missing from evidence.

If certified, Det. Aldridge failed to answer truthfully during the Feb 27, 2014 deposition.
If not certified, Det. Aldridge failed to answer truthfully during Nov 24, 2014 evidentiary hearing.
Which is it?

Offense Class 7b. Commission of a felony
Offense Class 4g. Through carelessness or omission creating or causing to be created a false, inaccurate, or misleading departmental report or record
The discovery of a fictitious police report and the creation of evidence that assisted with a conspiracy to falsely imprison and convict a man for a crime he did not commit. V13-8172 Evidence Report 02/17/2014 – Counterfeit Wisconsin Driver’s License. This alone brings into question the adverse impact upon the professional image of the dept. as both the Camas PD and Skamania County Sheriff’s Office are now implicated.

Lastly, if the electronic police reports can not be edited and something needed to be added, then obviously a later incident would not be referenced after the report’s print date. Take a closer look at V14-16534 and you will find there is an example in the report narrative on Oct 27, 2014 after the report date of Oct 24, 2014. We have multiple examples of incidents being reported after the report’s print date. There will be a detailed response that will identify each incident in numerous reports that were reported after the report’s print date. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,

Guy Bini


From: Kevin.Hatley@cityofvancouver.us
To: bini.guy@outlook.com
Subject: RE: Appeal to amend V14-16534
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:29:45 +0000

Good afternoon, Mr. Bini,

I will need to ask our case management sergeant to see if that is even possible. Almost all of the agencies in the greater Portland area recently switched to a new report system and I’m not certain how our old system’s reports are being connected or uploaded. I do know the old system, which is the system under which V13-8172 and V14-6772 were written, can no longer be used to author reports at all, so I believe there is no longer a way to update information into those reports.

This might be a little long-winded but I’m going to try and explain some of the practical issues with that reporting system. The RCN box in the old report system was not a mandatory field (since most reports are not related to other investigations) and typically officers didn’t use it at all. Some used it to link the original reports (unless there was a supplemental report that provided information which related a case to another case at a later time). More often than not officers referred to associated or related reports in their narrative because you couldn’t conduct a search for the RCN box. For example, if I had a report number to search for, such as V14-6772, and I saw the RCN was completed in one of the reports for V13-8172, I would know that the whole investigation was linked by whomever authored the report that linked them. Conversely, V13-8172 would never show it was linked to V14-6772 unless someone authored a new supplemental report for V13-8172 to document the link. I don’t think it actually physically links them at all; I believe it’s just a text box for information but I’ll check on that too.

That program didn’t have backwards compatibility for linking information either. You may have seen instances where a person’s personal identifiers were in one report but didn’t appear in another report or at least not all of them. It’s because all fields were manually completed and nothing could be imported, so if it wasn’t a mandatory field it often wasn’t filled in; particularly in instances where one officer was authoring multiple reports under the same report number. There was one exception to that, at that was only for a supplemental report. Some fields, such as a name or address, could be imported into a supplemental report from the other reports written under that case number but it was very limited (even phone numbers couldn’t be imported even though addresses could). That being said, some officers were more diligent about it than others, but once it’s in one report, we would presume they’re all linked unless the narrative told us otherwise.

Additionally, once a report was approved by a supervisor in that system, it couldn’t be edited for content at all (unless either the case management people or other program administrators have that ability). So if an officer wrote a report and it was approved and they didn’t fill in the RCN but it needed to be added, then a whole new supplemental report would have to be written and only then could they fill in the RCN for information (and explain why they wrote the new report to add the RCN).

I apologize for the long reply but I will check with the case management sergeant and let you know what they say. I don’t believe the CCSO records personnel have the authority to change a VPD report.

Regards,

Kevin Hatley | Sergeant

Professional Standards Unit

Vancouver Police Department

605 E. Evergreen Blvd

Vancouver, WA 98661

Desk: 360.487.7471

From: Guy Bini [mailto:bini.guy@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 9:15 AM
To: Hatley, Kevin
Cc: Traci Eccles; Judy McDonald; Kent Steinmetz; Jamie Jackson
Subject: FW: Appeal to amend V14-16534

Sgt. Hatley,

Attached is an appeal to amend V14-16534 sent to the CCSO requesting that V14-6772 be included as the RCN.

This brings into question the RCN for V14-6772. V13-8172 was the original RCN as identified on the 5/7/2014 report. Since then, V13-8172 has gone missing from every other supplemental report related to V14-6772.

Which VPD personnel do I send an appeal to amend V14-6772 to include the reference case number V13-8172?

Please advise. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Guido A. Bini

From: bini.guy@outlook.com
To: sheriff@clark.wa.gov
CC: eccles.traci@gmail.com; butnottoohot@hotmail.com; kentsteinmetz@msn.com; jmcdonald.macdonald@gmail.com; bonnieatcoast@peak.org; larsstill@peak.org; fred@sgrealtyinc.com; jrs1040@yahoo.com
Subject: Appeal to amend V14-16534
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:50:22 -0700

To: CCSO Records Manager
Attached is the formal request of appeal to amend V14-16534.
The original letter with wet ink signature has been deposited with the USPS and should arrive early next week.

Please feel free to contact me via email at bini.guy@outlook.com should you have any further questions.
Sincerely,

Guido “Guy” Bini
(360) 907-3841

html { font-family: “Color Emoji”, “Calibri”, “Segoe UI”, “Meiryo”, “Microsoft YaHei UI”, “Microsoft JhengHei UI”, “Malgun Gothic”, “sans-serif”; }

July 27, 2015

Chief Lackey,

Thank you for providing the four pages of orphan documents to CPD report, C12-3079. Obviously, the orphan documents are NOT a Skamania County Sheriff’s Office report of the alleged incident that was identified in EPR C12-3079, a report that became the basis for VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge’s probable cause report in the State’s faux Criminal Impersonation case Vs John Garrett Smith, 13-1-01062-3. After 19 months, this charge was dropped promptly by the DVPC once Garrett Smith obtained counsel outside of Clark County in January 2015. The bogus Criminal Impersonation charge was one of many tactics used to keep Garrett Smith unlawfully imprisoned in the Clark County jail until he was finally convicted 18 months later of Attempted Murder II and Assault II, both of which are crimes he did not commit.

As you can see, the supplemental report dated 02/26/2014 was unnecessary and it begs the question: Why did Officer Smith need to create a 1 page report that summarized his original report dated 12/15/2012? Is this standard procedure? Of the dozens of EPRs that I have read, I have not found another supplemental report that regurgitated information like the 02/26/2014 supplement. There appears to be no justification for the 2/26 supplement.

When did Officer Jeff Smith retire? The handwritten signature of the approving officer, D. Norcross, appears on the 2/26/2014 supplemental report.

Sir, your department is now neck deep in a conspiracy in which VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge and others framed John Garrett Smith for Attempted Murder II. There is another version of the 12/15/2012 incident, one that describes Officers Smith and Robison responding to a report of a girl’s bicycle that was found on the Lacamas Lake Trail with a pair of panties nearby. Oddly enough, the story of the found bike failed to be mentioned in the 12/15/2012 Camas report that Detective Aldridge used as the basis for filing her probable cause report of Criminal Impersonation against John Garrett Smith on June 5, 2013. VPO Det. Aldridge has already proven herself to be a fraud in this matter now that it has been discovered she submitted the “Counterfeit Wisconsin ID” into evidence via the 2/17/2014 supplemental report. Given the set circumstances surrounding the false reports involving Aldridge and the CPD and the VPD, it stands to reason that the questionable supplemental Camas report dated 2/26/2014 is part of this fraud.

Chief Lackey, you challenged me to find any wrongdoing with a Camas Police Officer. If I did, then you encouraged me to file a report. Well, sir, all I have to offer you at this time is circumstantial evidence in spite of attempts to cover up wrongdoing by both agencies. Det. Aldridge’s fabricated claims against John Garrett Smith are falling apart in real time. I’m telling you this because I appreciated the prompt and professional manner in which you replied to the July 16 email.
At this time, it would appear that the CPD records clerk, Julie Norcross, who completed the April 24, 2014 public disclosure request, has played a pivotal role in promoting the fraudulent police reports. Camas EPR C12-3079 contains verifiably false information such as the non-existent SCSO report as well as the omission of the story of the girl’s bike. Besides State’s “Brady Cop” list, Officer D. Norcross shares the same last name as Julie Norcross. The appearance of the same last name of two people that authorized these reports, one of which is a “Brady Cop”, does not inspire confidence in these reports.

The story of John Garrett Smith’s false conviction is finally beginning to gain momentum; a story intent on exposing the truth and the bad actors. Which side of this travesty will the Camas PD fall on? The side that helped to frame innocent man that continues to perpetuate a lie? Or one that comes to the rescue the same innocent man with autism? Chief Lackey, you have the power to investigate. Please investigate CPD report C12-3079 and its supplements.

Sincerely,
Guido A. Bini
Concerned citizen and resident of Vancouver, WA

On July 19th, John Garrett Smith spent his birthday in prison for the 3rd year in a row.  On June 3rd, 2013, he was unnecessary and tragically ripped from the lives of his four young boys; two still in school, and two who are now young adults. Garrett was falsely accused, maliciously prosecuted and wrongfully convicted of crimes he did not commit. 

 
The suppressed evidence, now being provided through a series of posts on the blog “Garrett’s Voice” is being exposed for the sole purpose of vindicating a man who is not only innocent beyond a “reasonable doubt”… he is innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt. (Click link below)
 
**Important note of caution to family and friends of John Garrett Smith: Information revealed here was kept hidden by prosecution and defense counsel prior to this time.  It may cause additional shock & upset to those who are close to the defendant.
 
July 27, 2015

Chief Lackey,

Thank you for providing the four pages of orphan documents to CPD report, C12-3079. Obviously, the orphan documents are NOT a Skamania County Sheriff’s Office report of the alleged incident that was identified in EPR C12-3079, a report that became the basis for VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge’s probable cause report in the State’s faux Criminal Impersonation case Vs John Garrett Smith, 13-1-01062-3. After 19 months, this charge was dropped promptly by the DVPC once Garrett Smith obtained counsel outside of Clark County in January 2015. The bogus Criminal Impersonation charge was one of many tactics used to keep Garrett Smith unlawfully imprisoned in the Clark County jail until he was finally convicted 18 months later of Attempted Murder II and Assault II, both of which are crimes he did not commit.

As you can see, the supplemental report dated 02/26/2014 was unnecessary and it begs the question: Why did Officer Smith need to create a 1 page report that summarized his original report dated 12/15/2012? Is this standard procedure? Of the dozens of EPRs that I have read, I have not found another supplemental report that regurgitated information like the 02/26/2014 supplement. There appears to be no justification for the 2/26 supplement.

When did Officer Jeff Smith retire? The handwritten signature of the approving officer, D. Norcross, appears on the 2/26/2014 supplemental report.

Sir, your department is now neck deep in a conspiracy in which VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge and others framed John Garrett Smith for Attempted Murder II. There is another version of the 12/15/2012 incident, one that describes Officers Smith and Robison responding to a report of a girl’s bicycle that was found on the Lacamas Lake Trail with a pair of panties nearby. Oddly enough, the story of the found bike failed to be mentioned in the 12/15/2012 Camas report that Detective Aldridge used as the basis for filing her probable cause report of Criminal Impersonation against John Garrett Smith on June 5, 2013. VPO Det. Aldridge has already proven herself to be a fraud in this matter now that it has been discovered she submitted the “Counterfeit Wisconsin ID” into evidence via the 2/17/2014 supplemental report. Given the set circumstances surrounding the false reports involving Aldridge and the CPD and the VPD, it stands to reason that the questionable supplemental Camas report dated 2/26/2014 is part of this fraud.

Chief Lackey, you challenged me to find any wrongdoing with a Camas Police Officer. If I did, then you encouraged me to file a report. Well, sir, all I have to offer you at this time is circumstantial evidence in spite of attempts to cover up wrongdoing by both agencies. Det. Aldridge’s fabricated claims against John Garrett Smith are falling apart in real time. I’m telling you this because I appreciated the prompt and professional manner in which you replied to the July 16 email.
At this time, it would appear that the CPD records clerk, Julie Norcross, who completed the April 24, 2014 public disclosure request, has played a pivotal role in promoting the fraudulent police reports. Camas EPR C12-3079 contains verifiably false information such as the non-existent SCSO report as well as the omission of the story of the girl’s bike. Besides State’s “Brady Cop” list, Officer D. Norcross shares the same last name as Julie Norcross. The appearance of the same last name of two people that authorized these reports, one of which is a “Brady Cop”, does not inspire confidence in these reports.

The story of John Garrett Smith’s false conviction is finally beginning to gain momentum; a story intent on exposing the truth and the bad actors. Which side of this travesty will the Camas PD fall on? The side that helped to frame innocent man that continues to perpetuate a lie? Or one that comes to the rescue the same innocent man with autism? Chief Lackey, you have the power to investigate. Please investigate CPD report C12-3079 and its supplements.

Sincerely,


Guido A. Bini
Concerned citizen and resident of Vancouver, WA

Posted in Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, Clark College, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, Fascism in America, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Legal System Corruption, MSM Mainstream Media Sycophancy, NATIONAL SECURITY-SURVEILLANCE STATE, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, Psyops, U.S. CULTURE OF FEAR AND NARCISSISM, Vantucky Corruption and Inbredness, Whistleblowers | Leave a comment

More Apparent Obstruction of Justice in Clark County

powerful 06e18d4c-4315-4ca5-a479-d385cec28258-medium

Lt. Creager,

Based on your response from yesterday, I can only surmise that you habitually fail to read my emails past the first line or two.
I will make this easy… and let’s just call it an official FOIA request:
1.  What training (if any) do law enforcement investigators with the VPD receive regarding their duty under Brady v. Maryland to notify the prosecutor of any potential exculpatory information discovered during an investigation?
2.  What policy does the VPD enforce from their departmental regulations requiring officers to disclose exculpatory evidence.  What penalties may result from non-compliance (provided there is such a policy enforced)?
Thank you.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Creager, Scott <Scott.Creager@cityofvancouver.us> wrote:
Dear Ms Eccles,

Unfortunately the e-mail you sent to me this morning contained no attachments, just the text below your explanation.  The purpose for my question to you was to establish when we received this request.  Fortunately Ms McJilton was able to quicky respond to both of us with the necessary information.  Here is a copy of the e-mail.

Scott Creager| Lieutenant
Valor, Professionalism, Duty
CITY OF VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON
Vancouver Police Department/Headquarters
W:(360) 487-7501

Scott.creager@cityofvancouver.us/      http://www.cityofvancouver.us
NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: This e-mail account is public domain. Any correspondence from or to this e-mail account may be a public record. Accordingly, this e-mail, in whole or in part may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56, regardless of any claim of confidentiality or privilege asserted by an external

From: Traci Eccles [mailto:eccles.traci@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:21 PM

Subject: Lt. Creager: IMPORTANT

Lt. Creager,

In reading your last email, it occurs to me that perhaps you are not taking the time to read beyond the introduction of my correspondences (if that).  Your question regarding this morning’sFOIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE REQUEST was unnecessary as I copied the request to the email sent to you, and I clearly stated that in the email. This would certainly explain the absence of any response from you regarding my request for information in an email dated July 15th and titled “Substantive due process issue”… I am still awaiting the response on that one.  Might I suggest you take a moment to read it now?

In the same category of concern, I have a few follow up questions regarding VPD policies and procedures regarding the altering and/or “back filling” of police reports after they have been stamped into record by the CCSO.  And no, I am not talking about supplemental reports… I am talking about multiple different versions of originals.

In exercising our rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Guy and I have discovered something important to our vindication, as well as that of Garrett Smith:  The truth will be revealed… if not through the ethical channels we had been hoping for, definitely through the barrage of inconsistency and outright falsification that has become the unavoidable by-product of repeated attempts on the part of various city and county entities to cover up the kind of egregious misconduct that has put us all in this position in the first place.

I will continue to wait for an informed response from you regarding my July 15th email Lt. Creager.  Thank you.

Traci Eccles, citizen of Clark County, Vancouver, WA

July 21, 2015

probable cause 13-1-01062-3   probable cause 2 486-491, Counterfeit WI DI – 6 pges

Camas Police Chief Lackey,

Thank you for your prompt reply and for making available the 4 pages of orphan documents. At the present time, I do not have any complaints regarding the Camas Police Dept.

Maybe you can help answer the following questions regarding the Camas Police reports identified in yesterday’s email.

1) Assuming the VPD already had the 12/15/2012 4 page CPD report in their possession, what is the justification for the one page one paragraph report created dated 02/26/2014 and faxed from the CPD to the VPD?

2) Why does the 02/26/2014 report narrative state orphan documents: NONE?

I will look forward to your response.

Attached are two Vancouver Police reports that are the work of Vancouver Police Officer Detective Sandra Aldridge that reference ‘Jens Gerhardt Spangaard’ in 2 separate versions of alleged ‘alias crimes’ of John Garrett Smith. The first was a false charge for Criminal Impersonation (13-1-01062-3) that was later dropped and the second version alleges the use of a Counterfeit Wisconsin Driver’s License that was entered into evidence in the Attempted Murder case (13-1-01035-6). Neither version of alleged ‘alias crimes’ references the other and much like the attempted murder charge and conviction in the State V. John Garrett Smith, they are false.

These fictitious police reports have been shared with the Vancouver Police Department’s Professional Standards Unit as part of the Internal Affairs Investigation of Det. Aldridge and her immediate supervisor and approving officer, Sgt. Andy Hamlin. You were likely unaware of these attachments as I just obtained your email address yesterday.  The Camas PD and the Skamania County Sheriff’s Office are included in these emails in order to bring these involved law enforcement agencies into the conversation.

The actions of Det. Aldridge and Sgt. Hamlin are so shocking to the conscience that any and all certified LEA’s would likely want to distance their agencies from the conduct of these Vancouver Police Officers. Their actions have tended to implicate other unsuspecting officers and I felt it was my civic duty to inform the CPD.

It has been said that one does not need to wear a badge to have honor. However, it should be a mandatory to have honor to wear the badge of law enforcement. Honor appears to emanate from you. Thank you again for your reply and for sharing valuable information.

Sincerely,

Guido A. Bini Concerned Citizen, Vancouver, WA

July 20, 2015
guy2 CPD 12-3079

Vancouver Police Department
Professional Standards Unit

Re: Internal Affairs Investigation – VPO Detective Sandra Aldridge
Fictitious Reporting Part II – Camas PD

The attached police reports should be added as an addendum to the complaint filed on July 16, 2015. These reports are the work of a zealot within the VPD and they exemplify a lack of supervision with no sign of any investigation work. These reports are the creation of a criminal mind hiding behind a badge and a wall of blue. They are the creation of Vancouver Police Officer Detective Sandra Aldridge. In addition, these reports now implicate the Camas Police Department (CPD).

The attached 1 page CPD report, ID 02/26/2014, narrative section states Orphan Documents “None.” However, page 2 of 4 of the CPD report, ID 12/15/2012, indicates Orphan Documents as “Skamania County Sheriffs Office Name/Call detail reports 4 pages.” Det. Aldridge has stated on record the SCSO report does not exist. Then why the contradicting reports? Now CPD is implicated with Aldridge through an alleged reporting that identified a Skamania CSO report in a Camas PD report that for all intents and purposes were falsely created and then reported by Aldridge.

Aldridge has already been proven to take liberties by creating and entering into evidence the fictitious evidence. Once she had the 1 page report from Camas PD, she then had taken the liberty to create more fictitious police reports that identify Camas PD & the Skamania SCO. The CPD report is disturbing because it demonstrates Aldridge had help creating these reports from CPD with the knowledge of her supervisors, PA Nugent and Sgt. Hamlin. It also indicates a willingness between LEA’s to assist with false reporting without question.
The 06/05/2013 declaration of probable cause filed by Aldridge appears to be back filled. The only question that one needs to ask is, “Why did it take CPD 8 months to fax Det. Aldridge and PA Jennifer Nugent on 2/27/2014 regarding a non-incident report that happened on December 15, 2012?  The answer lies with the lies of the fictitious report filed on 2/17/2014 and entered into evidence by VPO Detective Sandra Aldridge.
The VPD has a real mess and it’s going to get messier but let’s not forget the victim in this crime, John Garrett Smith, was falsely convicted of a crime he did not commit. This would not mark the first time this has happened in Clark County. Will he be the last?
Respectfully,
Guido A. Bini
Concerned citizen, Vancouver, WA
(360) 907-3841
In the 18 months leading up to the December 1-3, 2014 trial of State v. John Garrett Smith, Deputy Prosecutor, Jennifer Nugent made emotion-filled, impassioned claims regarding the absolute guilt of Garrett Smith. She made accusatory statements, in open court, indicating that the alleged victim was continuing to fight for her life up to a year after the initial arrest.  When delivering these arguments (pre trial) Ms. Nugent frequently referenced “piles of medicals” alleged to have reached over 600 pages as of a February 17th, 2014 bail reduction hearing.

Those “piles of medicals” that were suppressed until discovery post-conviction, prove one of two things:  Either Ms. Nugent did not read ANY of the medical documentation… or she committed a level of perjury that can only be described as “shocking to the conscience.”
The attachments to this email were sent out today to those medical professionals whose documented assessments were grossly misrepresented by Ms. Nugent. In her overzealous determination to secure a conviction against John Garrett Smith, an individual with high functioning Asperger’s Syndrome who was repeatedly denied equal access to justice, Ms. Nugent violated her oaths as a prosecutor in a vile, reprehensible manner.
July 16, 2015 Power of the Herd

Please view two minute video at the following link:

Buffalo & Croc v. Lions of Clark County

Thank you,
Concerned, law-abiding citizen of Clark County, Vancouver, WA

Vancouver Police Department Professional Standards Unit

Internal Affairs Investigation Complaint: Det. Sandra Aldridge

Re: Fictitious Evidence Report – Counterfeit WI ID

Case No. V13-8172:         Supplemental Report ID: 02/17/2014

Evidence Report ID:         1409-033 – Counterfeit WI ID Attempted Murder I:       13-1-01035-6  June 3, 2013 Superior Ct Criminal Impersonation: 13-1-01062-3  June 5, 2013 Superior Ct

Reporting Officer:            Aldridge, Sandra        PSN: 1409 Approving Officer:           Hamlin, Andy             PSN: 1095 Prosecuting Attorney:     Nugent, Jennifer        WSBA: 36833

486-491, Counterfeit WI DI – 6 pges   probable cause 13-1-01062-3

Background:

On June 3, 2013, John Garrett Smith was charged with Assault II domestic violence, a crime he did not commit.

On December 11, 2013, without warning, without probable cause nor medical evidence, the Assault II charge was escalated to Attempted Murder 1. In reality, Smith’s wife, Sheryl Cresap Smith, a woman with known mental disorders, assaulted Smith as he slept the night of June 2, 2013. Newly revealed evidence, along with contradicting testimony of State’s witnesses, indicates that Cresap had help the night of June 2, 2013 with a premeditated and carefully planned scheme.  Accusations made against Garrett Smith by Sheryl Cresap and Detective Sandra Aldridge are refuted in court records by the medical evidence and medical testimony; the alleged beating simply did not occur.

There is no better way to describe the fictitious reports filed by Detective Sandra Aldridge in this case than “shocking to the conscience”. The report filed on 02/17/2014 is based on manufactured evidence recycled from the Criminal Impersonation claim eight months prior. In addition, it will be revealed that Aldridge has a long history of manufacturing evidence during her career in law enforcement, as well as suspicious and unprofessional behavior while hiding behind the color of blue. Detective Sandra Aldridge exhibits characteristics of a sociopath and criminal.

On June 5, 2013, just two days after the initial arrest, Aldridge completed a “declaration of probable cause” for a second unrelated charge of Criminal Impersonation against Smith, 13-1-01062-3. This charge was arranged in order to hold Garrett longer and prevent him from making bail. It was another tentacle used with malice to keep Smith incarcerated in the Clark County Jail over the next 18 months. Imagine one day in jail for a crime you did not commit, then multiply that by 540. The act of holding the accused for extended periods of time is a common practice in Clark County. It also enabled the malicious prosecution that ultimately resulted in the wrongful conviction of Smith for Attempted Murder II on Dec. 3, 2014, a crime he did not commit.

Revelations:

Criminal acts inflicted upon Smith were perpetrated by those who abused their power under the color of law. These individuals betrayed oaths of office in an attempt to engineer another false conviction in Clark County. Their willful suppression of exculpatory evidence was done with malice and can now be reviewed in a methodical and deliberate approach that an honest investigation would have revealed.

The attached reports are just part of a series of examples that will shed light onto chronic falsification in police reports by Detective Sandra Aldridge. These fictitious reports should embarrass every honest Vancouver Police Officer and every honorable Clark County Prosecuting Attorney. As sworn peace officers and judicial officers, they are required to subscribe to an oath of office in which “We the people” give our consent to be governed by entrusting these officers of the law to uphold the constitutions of both the State of Washington and these United States. Fictitious police reports are not part of our consent to govern. Fictitious police reporting is a crime, and knowing about it without acting is a Misprision of Felony.

The police report entered into evidence on 02/17/2014 by Detective Sandra Aldridge (Aldridge) is entirely fabricated. The significance of Feb 17 report is that Aldridge completely ignores her own creation of a previous false report that involved the Camas PD created on 06/05/2013. Aldridge created an unrelated “trumped up” charge of Criminal Impersonation from a December 15, 2012 event in Camas, WA that was identified in a CPD incident report. She filed her fabricated charge of Criminal Impersonation on 06/05/2013 based on speculation as Camas PD did not send a copy of C12-3079 that occurred on 12/15/2012 until February 27, 2014, ten days after Aldridge entered the Counterfeit Wisconsin ID into evidence [for the second time] with the claim that it had been newly discovered by alleged victim in January 2014. There is absolutely no justification nor will there be to explain this blunder. It’s a false report that the VPD, the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office and Smith’s own defense counsel tried to suppress.

Conspiracy is spelled C – O – N – S – P – I – R – A – C – Y, and used in a sentence as, “the conspiracy employed to falsely imprison John Garrett Smith, and ultimately convict him of a crime he did not commit, involved the Vancouver Police Department, the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office as well as his own defense counsel.”  All three entities conspired to suppress evidence, spread false light, and defame the character of the accused.

Aldridge and her immediate supervisor, Sgt. Andy Hamlin, have initiated fraud upon the court in the State’s capital case Vs. John Garrett Smith, and Deputy Prosecutor Jennifer Nugent has perpetuated it. Aldridge, Hamlin, Nugent and others to be named in the days to follow are the true criminals. They conspired to charge and convict John Garrett Smith of crimes he did not commit. Report ID 02/17/2014 should be the poster child for the fraud that represented the State’s false conviction of John Garrett Smith.

The assertions herein made have not been taken lightly nor were they made as a reprisal. The light of truth does not act with malice. It acts to cleanse and disinfect.

The information contained in the two police reports attached to this email is intended to inform decision makers in an effort to correct a deplorable travesty of justice. It is also intended to expose the type of false reporting and suppression of evidence that enabled this travesty in the hope of preventing it in the future.

The actions of Aldridge, Hamlin and Nugent, under the color of law, against complainants Bini & Eccles clearly demonstrate the State’s motive behind the witness intimidation and the tactics that were deployed by the Vancouver Police Department.

Countdown to TORT action begins in T minus 5. Sincerely,

Guido A. Bini & Traci D. Eccles Concerned citizens and residents of Vancouver, WA

*Approved for Redistribution

 

 

 

Posted in Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, Bumper Sticker "Faith" in Bumper Sticker America, Capitalism and Psycho-Sociopathy, Clark College, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, Fascism in America, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Government Corruption, Legal System Corruption, Mormon Racism, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, U.S. CULTURE OF FEAR AND NARCISSISM, Vantucky Corruption and Inbredness, Whistleblowers | Leave a comment

More Repression and Lawlessness by Law Enforcement and Judiciary

jedgar9imagesHDBKTB2E

Note From Jim Craven”

If you have knowledge, not hearsay or rumor, direct knowledge of the commission of a felony crime, that knowledge is not yours to keep and use as you wish. Someone has been harmed and whoever did it needs to be stopped before doing it again. 18 USC 4 Misprision of a Felony. Do not go to local law enforcement here including FBI who are well aware of the corruption and inbredness in the various law enforcement agencies. While there are individual cops and special agents that appear decent, the ones at the Senior Supervisory level and above would not be where they are were they not made of the same stuff and have the same mentality as their patron saint whose name adorns the FBI HQ building which is as vile as flying the confederate flag standing for segregation and slavery. Hoover and his same-gender wife Clyde Tolson, were both vile criminals and psychopaths who destroyed the lives of many innocents, and the fact that FBI HQ still has this creature’s name proudly on their building says it all.

Go outside of this area, do not ever talk to FBI even about the weather without a lawyer or witness with guts present. Do not ever talk to FBI on the phone. Do not ever let them into your house for an interview but meet them outside of your house. Ask for a written acknowledgement of your visit and purpose in writing. Check all identification and record all names fully for possible use with OPR or the OIG. Remember they were not hired for brains they were hired for attitude and mentality; the same kind demonstrated by Mr. and Mrs. J Edgar Hoover when they ran the shop. Do not ever record without permission but ask permission to record.

I will be taking boxes of evidence to Washington D.C and there are people who hate corruption and corrupt cops in particular that are watching this place and these ones have no fear of any government agency.

Further, I have evidence of a professional level break-in at my house which I have documented and will take elsewhere. If I catch anyone at my house I will exercise lawful self-and-home-defensive armed force and document it.

JEH clint-eastwood-hoover-biopic-j-edgar-enrages-former-fbi-agents

 

I was unable to identify an email address for VPD Corporal Stephen Pfuel, but it might be important for him to be aware of the forwarded information. Also, you may want to interview him for the internal affairs investigation as he was credited, under oath, during Garrett’s trial and in Aldridge’s police report, for having taken the most damning and grossly falsified photos of alleged “victim” at the residence early AM June 3rd. However, Corporal Pfuel was not a witness, therefore he did not have the opportunity to authenticate these photos to be used as evidence during trial.

In Feb. 2014 sworn depositions, Officer Yong claims to have taken the faux photos, while in his deposition, Hamlin slips up by crediting Aldridge for taking the photos.  In addition, (tampered) meta-data shows the “bloody” injury photos of Ms. Cresap taken at the scene occurred AFTER she had already been taken to the hospital by ambulance.

Further, according to AMR and emergency staff upon arrival, Ms. Cresap did not exhibit an excess of blood on her face (as is depicted in the photos)… there was very little blood and it was controlled prior to exam by AMR.  It was the extreme swelling of the face that was noted by first responders and hospital medical staff–a symptom that was common to Ms. Cresap’s known allergy to the gluten in alcohol (her face would swell to the point of her eyes swollen shut). This too, was suppressed along with her estimated .24 BAC at time of incident (measured hours later at hospital to be .19).

Please feel free to email me with any questions or requests for clarification regarding the information I am providing.  Thank you.

Traci Eccles

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Traci Eccles <eccles.traci@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:58 PM
Subject: Re-send of Involvement in State v. JG Smith

Note:  Due to video attachment in prior email, many recipients were excluded from delivery. The video clip referred to in the message can be viewed by clicking on the link below:

Outside of the Law 

Important message to “involved parties,” whether complicit, coerced or unaware:

John Garrett Smith was wrongfully convicted of Attempted Murder II and Assault II on December 3rd, 2014 in a Clark County, Vancouver, WA courtroom. On November 3rd, three weeks prior to trial, the defendant opted to fire his defense team and proceed Pro Se.  Over the next two weeks, Judge Robert Lewis, who would act as the sole trier of fact in the upcoming bench trial, prevented Garrett access to justice by denying him the following in open court:

  1. ADA accommodations for defendant’s qualified disability of Asperger’s Syndrome
  1. The ability to quickly and efficiently submit motions to the court by requiring defendant to seal, stamp and send all documents through the USPS rather than allow them to be delivered directly to the recipients in the building adjacent to the county jail
  1. Refusal to provide proper technology to view the “redacted” discovery provided to the defendant in CD format a full week after the November 7thhearing. (Incidentally, despite the week delay by the prosecutor’s office to deliver this critical evidence in an inaccessible format, no redaction had been done, suggesting that it was never a concern that the defendant would actually view the evidence)

As a direct result of #3 above, Garrett Smith had no option but to rehire defense attorney Josephine Townsend to represent him in trial.  [SEE ATTACHED VIDEO CLIP FROM EVIDENTIARY HEARING HELD MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24TH, THE DAY AFTER TOWNSEND WAS REHIRED]   Ms.Townsend would go forward to play a key role in the prosecution’s conviction of her client.

After Garrett Smith’s wrongful conviction in a bench trial with a crooked judge after being coerced out of his right to a jury, he was sentenced to 12 years in prison for Attempted Murder II and Assault II, crimes he did not commit. When Garrett was transferred into custody of the DOC in February 2015, he requested that Guy and I pick up his personal belongings from Clark County Jail.

While reorganizing Garrett Smith’s personal effects for storage, we discovered two manila envelopes containing 20 discovery CDs and an 8 gig thumb drive (**see image below).  Clearly someone from the prosecutor’s office botched the job by failing to retrieve the “dirty discovery”.  The hidden medical records, unknown  and highly exculpatory audio-taped depositions of State’s witnesses, blatant proof of misconduct, and implication of widespread collusion spilled out of those envelopes. The originals were handed over to Garrett Smith’s appeal attorneys, the John Henry Browne Law Group in Seattle, WA.

The CDs were downloaded to expose the “rats” that currently infest the Clark County Criminal Justice System, and to direct the attention of the governing bodies of Vancouver and Clark County, both locally and in Olympia, to the liability in front of them. There bares an overwhelming similarity between the methods used to wrongfully convict John Garrett Smith to those applied in the wrongful conviction of now exonerated former Vancouver Police Officer Clyde Ray Spencer 30 years ago.

**For more information click the following link:   GARRETT’S VOICE

The purpose of this correspondence is to alert all those individuals potentially implicated through the suppression of exculpatory evidence by Deputy Prosecutor, Jennifer Nugent, in direct violation of Brady v. Maryland.

A summary list of previously hidden information follows:

  • Suppressed State’s witness depositions
  • Medical evidence directly refuting claims of Deputy Prosecutor, Jennifer Nugent
  •  Scandalous discrepancies in police reports allegedly written by Vancouver Police Officers Ly Ratha Yong, Sandra Aldridge and Sgt. Andy Hamlin
  • Altered video surveillance tapes from Clark County jail during early AM June 3rd, 2013 booking of defendant
  • Verification of crime scene spoliation
  •  Identities of key witnesses (VPD, Clark County Sheriff’s Office and medical professionals) suppressed by prosecution
  • Falsified photo evidence
  • Tampered digital forensic evidence, including destruction of portions favorable to defendant
  • Appearance of medical insurance fraud

All citizens have a moral obligation and a civic duty to report criminal activity. Along the same lines, it is the constitutional right of every citizen who adheres to that duty to have the benefit of protection from retaliation as Federal and State law mandates.  Whether or not you had direct knowledge of the circumstances under which you were included in the harassment and retaliation of myself and/or Guy Bini, or connected to the the previously suppressed discovery in the case of State v. John Garrett Smith, it is your right to be made aware that, as a result of the bad acts of those who abused their power and discretion within the criminal justice system of Clark County,  WA, you may be an unwitting accomplice to criminal acts.

**DISCLAIMER:  The material provided in this letter is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice.  Additionally, said information has been shared through exercise of 1st Amendment right to Freedom of Speech, as a direct response to obligations of Title 18 U.S. Code § 4: Misprision of felony, and under the protection of Title 18 U.S. Code § 241 and 242: Conspiracy against rights as well as under color of law plus the Federal and State whistleblowers Protection acts

Checking in…
Everything is moving forward and we are optimistic about the potential for favorable results in both full exposure of Garrett’s wrongful conviction and an eventual end to the harassment and retaliation that we have been victims to.
The arrogance of these people never fails to  astound me!  Below is a screenshot of the wifi connections that come up on my laptop.
Our neighbors moved in November 2014–one month prior to Garrett’s trial and within days of initiation of our BOLO warnings as OFFICER SAFETY RISK. They occupy their townhome in shifts rotating on a regular schedule.  Only two of their six vehicles have parking permits (that is the limit the complex provides per residence) 3 of the vehicles are Mustangs in various stages of restoration (VPD has a high number of officers that are Mustang enthusiasts and are members of local Mustang Car Clubs. Various visitors also drive Car Club style Mustangs.
Note what our “neighbors” have named their wifi connection…whatever!!! We have been tempted to go next door and say, “You have to be one or the other…cops or drug dealers, which are you?”
**Note:  We would actually prefer drug dealers at this point! 😱

Inline image 1

Sgt. Hatley,
 
Copied and pasted below (in brick red and blue font) is a request for information from a party currently following up on the wrongful conviction of Garrett Smith, as well as the responses I shared.  This is important to the Professional Standards Unit investigation for a number of reasons:
 
1.  The harassment, retaliation and witness intimidation Guy Bini and I have suffered is a direct result of our connection to case #13-1-01035-6 State of Washington v. John Garrett Smith. 
 
2.  Detective Sandra Aldridge openly admitted multiple times under oath that she did not do any background investigation regarding Ms. Cresap (alleged victim to Garrett and Guy), or any of her claims. Having done NO background verification, Aldridge proceeded to shamelessly “witness vouch” for Ms. Cresap far beyond her involvement as “lead investigator” in the State’s case against Garrett.  She has been the self-assigned body-guard of Ms. Cresap , accuser of Guy Bini on the witness stand in a civil anti-harassment hearing, and self-appointed participant in Sheryl Cresap’s divorce by submitting non-redacted, defamatory and inaccurate claims attacking Guy and I in court record.
 
3. What follows is just the tip of the iceberg regarding the lack of credibility (as well as indication of mental/ emotional instability) of an individual upon whose testimony an innocent man was wrongfully convicted.  Ms. Cresap’s bizarre and inconsistent accusations and behavior has wreaked havoc on the lives of Guy Bini, Garrett Smith, me and all of our families.
 
Background information related to questions/response below:
 
April 17th, 2014  During a bail reduction hearing, well into the malicious prosecution of John Garrett Smith on false charges of Attempted Murder in the 1st degree,  Prosecutor Jennifer Nugent, made outrageous claims indicating that ‘600 pages of medicals’ prove that the victim, Sheryl Cresap-Smith, is still fighting for her life ‘to this day’.
April 24th, 2014 Sheryl Cresap-williams filed a personal injury claim in neighboring Skamania County.  The complaint alleged life-threatening personal injury from a bicycle crash that had occurred in September 2012, when the dog belonging to Steve and Judith Whitcomb chased the tandem bike she and Garrett were on while they rode past the Whitcombs’ house. Sheryl Cresap was attempting to collect for personal injury citing the same injuries for which she claimed Garrett had ‘brutally beat her and left her for dead’.
Important note:   When responding to questions during a defense deposition regarding her allegations against Garrett Smith, Ms. Cresap claimed Garrett tried to kill her in that September 2012 tandem bike crash as she insisted she ‘had no recollection of any dog’.
April 28th, 2014 Detective Sandra Aldridge improperly served (missing multiple pages of document) a temporary anti-harassment order to Guy Bini on behalf of Sheryl S. Smith.  In her written statements, petitioner Cresap claimed that the same emotional trauma she attributed to Garrett was instead due to (fictitious) harassment by Guy Bini. While her statements verified that she has never seen, met or been contacted by Guy, she claimed to be terrified of him and believed he planned to kill her.
The questions below are regarding information about a personal injury claim filed against Steve and Judith Whitcomb by Sheryl Cresap in April of 2014.  A visual displaying the three court cases can be found by clicking this link:     
Victim Trifecta  (scroll to middle of webpage)
[Questions asked and my responses follow]
 

Traci, do you have the court case number for this alleged personal injury claim?

 Court: Skamania Superior
Case Number: 14-2-00059-8
 
This claim was filed within days of the filing of anti-harassment order against Guy. She filed this one in Skamania County under one of her previous alias (Cresap-williams… with a lower case ‘w’) undoubtedly in the attempt to keep her 3 current litigation actions from intersecting.

Did Cresap retain an attorney for this claim?
Yes, her attorney for this personal injury claim was Bruce Colven of the Vancouver law firm Caron, Colven, Robison & Shafton. During trial, Cresap first feigned memory loss regarding this attorney… then she said she had “no idea what her attorney did…”, then eventually she broke into a detailed and bitter explanation of how she didn’t get anything out of the Whitcombs because they did not have homeowner’s insurance.  During this testimony Cresap made the comment, “no insurance, no money.”
 
Additional interesting tidbits:
 
During this short stretch of time in April-May 2014, while she was alleged to be destitute and living in a garage, Ms. Cresap was retaining the services of :
1.  Attorney Brian Walker, who had been representing Ms. Cresap’s interests for nearly a year regarding her alleged injuries from the incident of June 2013  AND, according to Sheryl Cresap’s testimony during the May 28th anti-harassment hearing, was representing her in her current fictitious divorce. The divorce had not been filed as claimed under oath on May 28th by Cresap; this was not refuted by attorney Brian Walker who was in the courtroom when Cresap made this statement. Ultimately, the divorce was initiated by Garrett, NOT Sheryl, in September 2014.
 
2.  Attorney Scott Swindell, who, according to Cresap’s testimony during Guy’s anti-harassment hearing on May 28th, was representing her interests in the “Garrett and Sheryl Smith Trust of 2012″  (we have been unable to determine what this is, but she brandies it about regularly in her testimonies and court documents)
 
3.  Attorney Bruce Colven who was representing her regarding her fraudulent personal injury claim against the Whitcombs of North Bonneville, WA in Skamania County.
 
4.  Attorney Jeff Holmes who represented her in the May 28th anti-harassment hearing against Guy
 
Ironically, in Ms. Cresap’s anti-harassment petition against Guy Bini, she applied and was granted a waiver of all fees due to her “indigent” status.  She even stated, in the documentation, under penalty of perjury, that she ‘had to sell all of her clothes in order to survive.’
 
**I always wondered where someone who ‘lives in a garage’ parks her BMW…
Re the bike/dog incident: was that the same alleged incident mentioned in court regarding injury involving a dog, a fall and a broken arm?
 
No, these are two entirely different events:
 
Bike/dog incident was basis of the personal injury claim above… took place with both Sheryl and Garrett on a tandem bike in North Bonneville, WA in September 2012, about 8 months prior to Garrett’s DV arrest in June 2013.
Dog/leash/fall/broken wrist incident took place in July 2013 prompting additional trip to emergency room.  PA Nugent and Cresap tried to call these injuries ongoing trauma from the “brutally-beat-and-left-for-dead-” false claims from the beginning of June 2013.
 –
Lieutenants Creager and Luse:

 –
Guy and I are fully aware that due process requires notice, and that the VPD may be found without liability for 14th Amendment due process violations in the event of an emergency situation warranting immediate action where public safety is concerned.  However, in a case such as ours where due process is possible, practicable and constitutionally required, but ignored, a serious problem exists. Is it too much to ask that you keep us informed in regard to the current status of the malicious “death threat” BOLO warnings placed against us by the VPD?
 –
Friday, October 24th, 2014 during a terry-stop three blocks from my residence, I discovered for the first time that my vehicle license plate had been placed on a BOLO (Be On the Look Out) alert as a VPD agency-wide broadcast…
 –
Through persistent public records requests, not through notification by the VPD,  I discovered in March that my license plate was associated with a new BOLO.
 –
Through persistent public records requests, not through notification by the VPDI discovered in April that Guy and I had both been placed on BOLO as “threat”
 –
Through persistent public records requests, not through notification by the VPDI discovered that we were alleged to have made “death threats” and had been labeled as “OFFICER SAFETY RISK” “APPROACH WITH CAUTION”
 
Note: To this day, we have not been contacted or questioned regarding these allegations.
 –
Through persistent public records requests, not through notification by the VPDI discovered that these outrageous, fictitious allegations against us had been elevated to a county-wide alert so that all law enforcement agencies in Clark County would consider us  “OFFICER SAFETY RISK” “APPROACH WITH CAUTION”.
 –
Note: This escalation of harassment against us was initiated by Sgt. Andy Hamlin, one of the subjects of a VPD Professional Standards Unit investigation in progress at the time of this bad act.  Most “shocking to the conscience…”  authorization for Hamlin’s actions came from his supervisor Lt. Doug Luse, a member of the Professional Standards Unit investigating our complaints of harassment by Sgt. Andy Hamlin and Detective Sandra Aldridge.
 –
Through persistent public records requests, not through notification by the VPDI discovered that on April 30, Lt. Luse cancelled the existing “death threat” BOLO alerts, and reissued new ones identical to the previous, but with “OFFICER SAFETY RISK” unchecked.  All defamatory and false narrative information regarding the danger and caution remained unchanged.
 –
Through persistent public records requests, not through notification by the VPDI discovered that on May 28, Lt. Luse cancelled the existing “death threat” BOLO
 –
First, please verify the final entry above, indicating cancellation of the alleged “death threat” BOLO alerts.  If affirmative, please explain to me why this information was not shared with us considering the fact that I have been denied repeated requests for the removal of the defamatory and dangerous mandate against us.  In numerous emails, I have expressed the impact this has had on my life and sense of safety outside of my own home (see attached for summary of just the initial requests for the BOLO to be removed).
 –
Thank you in advance for your prompt response to my questions. Also, if the BOLO issue is closed, I would like the information/findings that led you to this decision.
 –
Traci Eccles

Posted in Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, FALSE FLAGS, Fascism in America, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, Government Corruption, MSM Mainstream Media Sycophancy, NATIONAL SECURITY-SURVEILLANCE STATE, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, Psyops | Leave a comment

Break In While Out of Town

snakesinsuits

forced entry letter

IMPORTANT! must read: http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/07/08/fbis-amazing-trick-to-avoid-accountability/

When Guy and I arrived home today at 11:35 am from a weekend trip, we immediately discovered that our townhome had been broken into.  However, it does not seem as if anything was stolen. We immediately videotaped evidence of the breakin and reported details of this discovery to the leasing office personnel in our apartment complex.  We let them know that we will prepare a report of this incident for their files today.  Management is fully aware, and has been kept abreast of our complaints regarding harassment, retaliation, witness intimidation and unlawful surveillance that is currently under investigation by the Vancouver Police Department Professional Standards Unit.

THE CRITICAL PURPOSE OF WIDE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS EMAIL IS AS FOLLOWS:
Those who continue to  terrorized us under the COLOR OF LAW have made little effort to conceal their attempts to attack our credibility and integrity through overt efforts to create a fictitious criminal background associated with both our names.
To date, Guy has been victim to two malicious arrests absent confirmation of probable cause, and in a blatant retaliatory act on November 4th, 2014, we were both placed on BOLO (be on the lookout) as OFFICER SAFETY RISKS based on a third party claim by VPD Sgt. Andy Hamlin that we made “DEATH THREATS” to a member of the city attorney’s office …who was informed by Deputy Prosecutor, Jennifer Nugent… who allegedly spoke on the phone with Josephine Townsend… who allegedly insisted that Guy and I displayed irrational aggression as we disclosed planned acts of violence against Ms. Nugent to Ms. Townsend during a meeting in her office the previous day. Guy and I have no relationship whatsoever with Josephine Townsend, and we were no where near her office on that day. Every shred of this outrageous tale is false.
In light of the above, as well as the rapidly escalating exposure of

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law

we fear there is potential that something has been planted in our residence to either falsely indicate criminal activity on our part, or to seriously harm us could be the purpose behind the recent break in. 

Bill and Jim-

Guy and I just wanted to express our gratitude again for all the support and encouragement we have gained from your efforts via “Welcome to the Blog of Jim Craven” and “Corrupt Washington,” as well as from the personal interest you have both taken in our situation. At this point, everything we release is automatically “approved for redistribution” in any way you see fit, as our connection to your efforts has proved invaluable.
Attached is the letter Guy has written to be filed with our apartment manager regarding the forced entry into our townhome. Also, I spotted a sentence structure error after I sent my email regarding the break in (final sentences should say:  we fear there is potential that something has been planted in our residence to either falsely indicate criminal activity on our part, or to seriously harm us.
We have made a decision to move forward swiftly, but with precise strategy.  We will be representing ourselves–Pro Se– in separate tort actions. The attorneys we have spoken to who have the power to take this on, have little to no desire to do so.  One actually stated [indicating Clark County], “That’s a rat’s nest I won’t take on…good luck.”  We have realized however, that we are our own best legal advocates because we have analyzed every detail of Garrett Smith’s case as well as our own.  We will keep you posted!
Sincerely,
Traci Eccles and Guy Bini
Traci Eccles and Guy Bini
html { font-family: “Color Emoji”, “Calibri”, “Segoe UI”, “Meiryo”, “Microsoft YaHei UI”, “Microsoft JhengHei UI”, “Malgun Gothic”, “sans-serif”; }message to “involved parties,” whether complicit, coerced or unaware:

John Garrett Smith was wrongfully convicted of Attempted Murder II and Assault II on December 3rd, 2014 in a Clark County, Vancouver, WA courtroom. On November 3rd, three weeks prior to trial, the defendant opted to fire his defense team and proceed Pro Se.  Over the next two weeks, Judge Robert Lewis, who would act as the sole trier of fact in the upcoming bench trial, prevented Garrett access to justice by denying him the following in open court:

  1. ADA accommodations for defendant’s qualified disability of Asperger’s Syndrome
  1. The ability to quickly and efficiently submit motions to the court by requiring defendant to seal, stamp and send all documents through the USPS rather than allow them to be delivered directly to the recipients in the building adjacent to the county jail
  1. Refusal to provide proper technology to view the “redacted” discovery provided to the defendant in CD format a full week after the November 7th hearing. (Incidentally, despite the week delay by the prosecutor’s office to deliver this critical evidence in an inaccessible format, no redaction had been done, suggesting that it was never a concern that the defendant would actually view the evidence)

As a direct result of #3 above, Garrett Smith had no option but to rehire defense attorney Josephine Townsend to represent him in trial.  [SEE ATTACHED VIDEO CLIP FROM EVIDENTIARY HEARING HELD MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24TH, THE DAY AFTER TOWNSEND WAS REHIRED]   Ms.Townsend would go forward to play a key role in the prosecution’s conviction of her client.

After Garrett Smith’s wrongful conviction in a bench trial with a crooked judge after being coerced out of his right to a jury, he was sentenced to 12 years in prison for Attempted Murder II and Assault II, crimes he did not commit. When Garrett was transferred into custody of the DOC in February 2015, he requested that Guy and I pick up his personal belongings from Clark County Jail.

While reorganizing Garrett Smith’s personal effects for storage, we discovered two manila envelopes containing 20 discovery CDs and an 8 gig thumb drive (**see image below).  Clearly someone from the prosecutor’s office botched the job by failing to retrieve the “dirty discovery”.  The hidden medical records, unknown  and highly exculpatory audio-taped depositions of State’s witnesses, blatant proof of misconduct, and implication of widespread collusion spilled out of those envelopes. The originals were handed over to Garrett Smith’s appeal attorneys, the John Henry Browne Law Group in Seattle, WA.
The CDs were downloaded to expose the “rats” that currently infest the Clark County Criminal Justice System, and to direct the attention of the governing bodies of Vancouver and Clark County, both locally and in Olympia, to the liability in front of them. There bares an overwhelming similarity between the methods used to wrongfully convict John Garrett Smith to those applied in the wrongful conviction of now exonerated former Vancouver Police Officer Clyde Ray Spencer 30 years ago.

**For more information click the following link:   GARRETT’S VOICE

The purpose of this correspondence is to alert all those individuals potentially implicated through the suppression of exculpatory evidence by Deputy Prosecutor, Jennifer Nugent, in direct violation of Brady v. Maryland.

A summary list of previously hidden information follows:

  • Suppressed State’s witness depositions
  • Medical evidence directly refuting claims of Deputy Prosecutor, Jennifer Nugent
  •  Scandalous discrepancies in police reports allegedly written by Vancouver Police Officers Ly Ratha Yong, Sandra Aldridge and Sgt. Andy Hamlin
  • Altered video surveillance tapes from Clark County jail during early AM June 3rd, 2013 booking of defendant
  • Verification of crime scene spoliation
  •  Identities of key witnesses (VPD, Clark County Sheriff’s Office and medical professionals) suppressed by prosecution
  • Falsified photo evidence
  • Tampered digital forensic evidence, including destruction of portions favorable to defendant
  • Appearance of medical insurance fraud

All citizens have a moral obligation and a civic duty to report criminal activity. Along the same lines, it is the constitutional right of every citizen who adheres to that duty to have the benefit of protection from retaliation as Federal and State law mandates.  Whether or not you had direct knowledge of the circumstances under which you were included in the harassment and retaliation of myself and/or Guy Bini, or connected to the the previously suppressed discovery in the case of State v. John Garrett Smith, it is your right to be made aware that, as a result of the bad acts of those who abused their power and discretion within the criminal justice system of Clark County,  WA, you may be an unwitting accomplice to criminal acts.

 

**DISCLAIMER:  The material material provided in this letter is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice.  Additionally, said information has been shared through exercise of 1st Amendment right to Freedom of Speech, as a direct response to obligations of Title 28 U.S. Code § 4: Misprision of felony, and under the protection of Title 18 U.S. Code § 241: Conspiracy against rights as well as the Federal and State whistleblowers Protection acts.

, I do not believe in coincidences, and since VPD has been keeping you both under surveilance for months, it would seem … more than likely …  VPD certainly should have noted  

a ‘stranger danger’ in your residence area.  
 
Isn’t VPD still ‘sitting’ on your doorstep? Set featured image
 
This vandalism appears to be a vicious harassment / intimidation attack of agression.
A vicious ACT which the “sicko” doer hopes will cost you money.   
Can you think of anyone who would act in such a sicko manner?
 
Recommendation:  
1.  File a VPD Police report.  
2.  File a report with whatever other policing agencies you deem 
should receive notification of this event.
 
Be safe.  Be Alert.  Report this matter ASAP.
Luv Yu,  
 

Posted in Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, Fascism in America, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Government Corruption, Legal System Corruption, Mainstream Media (MSM) Shills, NATIONAL SECURITY-SURVEILLANCE STATE, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, Psyops, U.S. CULTURE OF FEAR AND NARCISSISM, U.S. Intelligence and Fascism, Vantucky Corruption and Inbredness, Whistleblowers | Leave a comment

Traci and Guy’s Letter to Governor Inslee on Corruption and Terrorism Against Whistle-blowers

Copied below is the e-message sent this morning (07/10/15) to the Washington State Governor’s office in Olympia:

Governor Inslee:
When my fiancé, Guy Bini, and I questioned and reported the fraudulent acts and clear motive of accuser, malicious actions of the prosecutor, and the irregularities regarding the investigation of Guy’s employer regarding criminal charges in Clark County, WA, our intent was not to champion a cause, become political activists or take on corruption.  In fact…. quite the opposite.  Guy Bini and I are both law abiding citizens, evidenced by our combined 100 years absent any record of criminal activity or violence. Ironically, it is our very commitment to justice and civic duty that has put targets on our backs.

In Clark County, Vancouver, WA, Guy and I have been victims to harassment, retaliation and witness intimidation for over a year regarding our connection to the case of Washington v. John Garrett Smith.  Garrett Smith, a brilliant, internationally-recognized, mechanical engineer diagnosed with high functioning Asperger’s Syndrome, was denied ADA accommodations, maliciously prosecuted and convicted by methods pulled right out of the 1980’s playbook used to wrongfully convict former Vancouver police officer, Clyde Ray Spencer.

Per my 1st Amendment rights, I have chronicled much of this ordeal in a blog titled, “Garrett’s Voice”.  The following link, that was sent out this morning both locally and Statewide to leaders and organizations concerned with restoring justice:

RAY SPENCER REPEAT

Ray Spencer was eventually released from prison through intervention from the Washington State Governor after nearly 20 years behind bars for a crime he did not commit.  By a twist of fate, the brazen arrogance of those who engineered this travesty, and the help of a few honest people behind the scenes who know the truth, we have come into possession (post-conviction) of a gold mine of suppressed evidence and proof of criminal conspiracy against rights.  Garrett Smith’s current attorneys for appeal are the John Henry Browne Group of Seattle.

We, however, are acting independently (with the same information). Our freedom, safety and lives, continue to be threatened by those in power who have proven they will go to great lengths to prevent the truth from becoming widely known.

As law-abiding, productive citizens of this State, we request the intervention of your office in this matter and sincerely appreciate the help you can provide in rectifying the wrongs done in both Garrett’s case and our own.  Thank you.

Traci Eccles and Guy Bini

[Approved for redistribution]

“You cannot submit to evil without allowing evil to grow. Each time the good are defeated, or each time they yield, they only cause the forces of evil to grow stronger. Greed feeds on greed, and crime grows with success. Our giving up what is ours merely to escape trouble would only create greater trouble for someone else.” — Louis Lamour, A Man Called Noon, Bantam, page 173. 

 
Our intent was not to champion a cause, become political activists or take on corruption.  In fact…. quite the opposite.  Guy Bini and I are both law abiding citizens, evidenced by our combined 100 years absent any record of criminal activity or violence. Ironically, it is our very commitment to justice and civic duty that has put targets on our backs.  
 
           HISTORY REPEATING
If you have had experience with corruption and being innocent and harassed by law enforcement or others please see link above.
Inline image 2

Inline image 2

Posted in Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, Government Corruption, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, U.S. Terrorism | 3 Comments

Folks Fighting Serial Corruption in the Legal System

The National Liberty Alliance – The largest organized effort fighting legal corruption

image_pdfimage_print

I’ve been following the progress of John Darash and the organization he founded, The National Liberty Alliance, for a few years as they work to bring ‘reform’ to our corrupt legal system. Over those years Darash has attracted ten’s of thousands of loyal supporters and people dedicated to the cause and willing to put their heart and soul in working to bring “truth and honor” back to a system that is as far from truthful and honorable as day is from night.

Darash believes, and he cites legal authority in support of his beliefs, that the only way to hold judges and lawyers to the laws that they swear to uphold is by establishing “Common Law Grand Juries.” These CLGJ’s have the duty to “investigate” and then “indict” those judges and lawyers who are found to be law-breakers based upon the results of their investigation. Said another way… citizens are assembled to oversee the behavior of judges and lawyers. And I AGREE 100% with this citizen oversight idea! Clearly the “self-regulation” that characterizes our present “legal system” has destroyed public confidence in our system of justice. The distrust brought about by the outright criminal activity occurring in our courts is moving all those who learn of the crimes being committed IN OUR COURTS to either join Darash or take personal action to expose and fight to restore the lost trust. The latter is my approach as well as efforts by Anne Block (reporter for the Goldbarreporter.org, John Scannell (candidate for WA State Supreme Court) … not to mention all those who tried earlier in time but were viciously retaliated against by the legal enterprise … like, Doug Schafer, and Bob Grundstein to name a couple.

John Darash is no joke, he is playing in the major league ballpark… through these CLGJ’s, based in their investigations ‘formal’ (as opposed to what is accepted as ‘legal’) processes have been issued – such as WRITS and INDICTMENTS. For the most part these processes have been symbolic as none of those to whom these WRITS or INDICTMENTS are directed consider them valid. BUT do they have political power?…. I believe they do and of course John Darash claims absolutely these processes are having a positive effect. John says,

Recently we collected and spent $16,000 to fax seven mandamuses [over one million pages] to “ALL” US Supreme Court Justices, Federal Judges, State Judges, Sheriffs, US Marshals, FBI Special Agents, Joint Chief of Staff, US Congress, US Senate, 50 State Senates, 50 State Assemblies and 50 Governors.

You can download pdf copies at http://nationallibertyalliance.org/rico. We also filed embossed sealed copies via U.S. Mail in all 94 Federal District Courts with powerful results. We have filed two Writ Habeas Corpuses that successfully released two People from jail.

Presently we are in the process of filing over 100 Writ Habeas Corpuses; Presentments a/k/a indictments against four federal judges, two US Attorneys, one FBI Agent and one clerk; re-filing Presentments against 8 top New York judges.

We are also planning to file numerous other court documents that we cannot talk about at this time. In order to file these papers we also need to fax all these papers to all of the aforementioned servants.

In my mind, any positive result in moving a corrupted system back to a respected branch of government is a success. And Darash proves that such success can be accomplished in the power that a well organized effort can accomplish. But organizations and what these organizations do requires a lot of money to execute on their strategic plan. John Darash has recently emailed his supporters asking for their help cover the costs in moving his efforts forward. He writes,

Since we started faxing we have been searching for a more affordable plan for faxing. Recently we found a company selling mass faxing software with 16 phone-line ports @ $440.00; 16 port (modems) hardware @ $2400.00 and 16 phone lines @ about $30/month each x 3 month; totaling $4280.00 plus approx. $800 for envelopes, paper, toner and stamps to file each document in all 94 district courts for a total cost of about $5000.00. This plan will allow us to send unlimited faxes for three months; and “ONLY” $480, for unlimited faxing, for each additional month after the next three months.

We must finish what we started; we cannot letup on the pressure we are building in the federal courts. Therefore we need $5000 ASAP to continue with our mission to save our Republic. Please donate over this Independence Day weekend. To donate by, credit card, check or money orders go to >

http://nationallibertyalliance.org/support-national-liberty-alliance

While I am not a member of the NLA, I admire all that John Darash has accomplished – both in organizing and executing a plan to address our failed judicial system. He is one of my present-day heroes who I celebrate this Independence Day.

Well done John… and God speed!

– See more at: http://www.corruptwa.com/opinion/the-national-liberty-alliance-the-largest-organized-effort-addressing-legal-corruption/#sthash.LgLFFDne.dpuf

Posted in Academia as Fraud, Clark College, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Government Corruption, Imperial Hypocrisy and Intrigue, Legal System Corruption, Mainstream Media (MSM) Shills, On Leadership, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, Social Systems Engineering Campaigns, Vantucky Corruption and Inbredness | 2 Comments

BRAVO! The US Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals GETS IT!!!!!

BRAVO! The US Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals GETS IT!!!!!

image_pdfimage_print

Whenever judges and lawyers RISE UP and do the right thing for the right reasons we must show our support and our appreciation. The US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals deserves this support and appreciation because they did the right thing for the right reason — BRAVO!

In a strongly worded and remarkable opinion, Gate Guard Services v. Thomas Perez, 14-40585-CV0, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, today ordered sanctions against the Department of Labor (DOL) for government misconduct, and remanded the case to the district court for an award to the private litigant of attorney’s fees because of the government’s “bad faith.” Writing for the unanimous Panel which included Judge Catharina Haynes and District Judge Marcia Crone, sitting by designation, Judge Edith Jones began:

It is often better to acknowledge an obvious mistake than defend it. When the government acknowledges mistakes, it preserves public trust and confidence. It can start to repair the damage done by erroneously, indeed vindictively, attempting to sanction an innocent business. Rather than acknowledge its mistakes, however, the government here chose to defend the indefensible in an indefensible manner. As a result, we impose attorneys’ fees in favor of Gate Guard as a sanction for the government’s bad faith. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b).

– See more at: http://www.corruptwa.com/researchandreports/bravo-the-us-federal-5th-circuit-court-of-appeals-gets-it/#sthash.JzDjwkxB.dpuf

Posted in Clark College, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Fascism in America, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Government Corruption, Legal System Corruption, NATIONAL SECURITY-SURVEILLANCE STATE, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, U.S. CULTURE OF FEAR AND NARCISSISM | 1 Comment

More VPD Harassment, Denial of Due Process and Cover-ups Against Whistle-Blowers

power 29c02e88-4a48-4456-89a6-48eb08b48c97-medium

Lt. Creager… et al;

Please accept my apology. One important thing I have learned from this horrifying ordeal is that NO ONE has the right to make outrageous, criminal allegations against another without accompanying facts to substantiate those claims. I know from personal experience that the recipient of such an unethical act is left stunned, shell-shocked and without a clear avenue to refute such false claims.  Therefore, I would like to give the opportunity to those who DID NOT give me the same, to know exactly what I mean when I state that I have been “continuously and intentionally denied due process of law.”  Following is a list of ways in which BOTH due process as well as policy and procedure of VPD have been denied at my expense:

  •   I have been named in three (3) EPR (electronic police reports) in which attempts have been made to infer that each is a separate, and isolated incident.  They are:  VP14-6772 (originally connected to a 4th report, VP13-8172—State of Washington v. John Garrett Smith, but later, perhaps on second thought, disassociated with the 2013 report), VP14-16534, and VP15-5279.

**NOTE: I WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN AWARE OF ANY OF THESE REPORTS HAD I NOT PERSISTENTLY DEMANDED PUBLIC RECORDS VIA FOIA REQUESTS MADE TO THE VANCOUVER CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, CRESA 911, AND THE CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT RECORDS DIVISION.  I HAVE BEEN ASSURED MULTIPLE TIMES THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER RECORDS INVOLVING ME, ONLY TO DISCOVER THAT, INDEED THERE ARE MORE…AND WITHIN THEM ARE MUCH MORE SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS DIRECTED AT ME.  IT SHOULD NOT BE A SURPRISE THAT I AM NOT COMFORTABLE WITH THE CLAIM MADE BY VPD PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS UNIT THAT THERE IS NO CURRENT INVESTIGATION OF GUIDO BINI OR MYSELF, AND NO FURTHER POLICE REPORTS BEING CONCEALED FROM US.

  •  Violations of due process and policy regarding inclusion of my name and personal information in VP14-6772 authored by Detective Sandra Aldridge and approved by Sgt. Andy Hamlin both of whom are currently under internal affairs investigation by the VPD Professional Standards Unit regarding multiple complaints of ongoing witness intimidation, harassment and retaliation against myself and Guido Bini:
  1. Associated with this report, I was named as “involved” party.  An iPhone belonging to me was taken unlawfully (without a warrant) from my possession by Sgt. Andy Hamlin during the false arrest of Guido Bini for unsubstantiated allegations of felony cyber-stalking on May 7th 2014.
  2. Detective Sandra Aldridge, who made the false arrest failed to follow policy and procedure by keeping the iPhone in her possession rather than in the evidence unit during a period of over 6 months that it was kept before being returned to me in Nov. 2014 when the investigation of Guido Bini was finally closed due to lack of evidence.
  3. When I contacted Sgt. Hamlin (Aldridge’s supervisor) to file a complaint, request a receipt for my seized property, and inquire as to the identity of the “unknown officer who took my iPhone”, he refused to acknowledge my complaints, refused to give me a receipt, and claimed he did not know who the male officer was (rather than identifying himself as that individual). ALL of this can be verified via email documentation.
  4. While the seized iPhone was in the possession of VPO Sandra Adridge (with the Domestic Violence Unit, despite the fact that the alleged six month open investigation of Guido Bini was not classified as a DV investigation), the application specific password on the iPhone was accessed and used to further access accounts on both of our personal laptop computers.
  •  Violations of due process and policy regarding inclusion of my name and personal information in VP14-16534 allegedly authored by VPD officer Taylor Smarr and approved by Sgt. Kennedy
  1. On Friday, October 24, 2014 (although the police report erroneously cites October 27th), I was the victim of a terry stop during which I was detained and not allowed access to my cell phone while other officers went to my apartment to initiate a second false arrest of Guido Bini per a BOLO alert associated with my vehicle license plate—a vehicle in which Guido Bini has no ownership or direct association.
  2. In this report, I am also named as “involved” as all of my personal information including my vehicle licensing information had been put on a BOLO (allegedly from July 3rd , but later stated to be from May 30, 2014) with probable cause for arrest of Guido A. Bini for misdemeanor cyber-stalking. The prior attempt for the false arrest of Guy Bini by Aldridge had been foiled with exoneration by Superior Court.  While she stated in this BOLO that the new arrest was ordered by Kevin McClure from the City Attorney’s Office and was supported by a new probable cause on file, neither turned out to be true.
  3. As was plainly clear to us at the time, and remains clear to us now, this was a staged event directly tied to the harassment and witness intimidation we had become victim to in direct connection to our position as potential witnesses for the defense in the case of Washington v. John Garrett Smith.
  4. What we were not aware of at the time, but have recently discovered through FOIA records requests is that there is a much deeper level of falsification and deceit surrounding this October 24th “mistaken” arrest.
  •  Violations of due process and policy regarding inclusion of my name and personal information as well as outrageous false allegations of death threats to a prosecutor in VP15-5279 authored by Sgt. Andy Hamlin and approved by Sgt. Andy Hamlin on April 1, 2015 WHILE he was under internal affairs investigation by the VPD Professional Standards Unit regarding multiple complaints of ongoing witness intimidation, harassment and retaliation against myself and Guido Bini:
  1. Unsubstantiated allegations of death threat made by me per statement from Josephine Townsend, I woman I have never spoken to whom, according to sworn statements made by Sgt. Andy Hamlin, I had divulged such nebulous threats to during a meeting held at Ms. Townsend’s office—a location I have never stepped foot in.
  2. My name, picture and personal information sent out on BOLO to ALL Clark County law agency personnel as being an “OFFICER SAFETY RISK” “APPROACH WITH CAUTION” (universally synonymous with armed and dangerous)
  3. Must be confronted by law enforcement if in the Hough neighborhood (I didn’t even know where this was or how to pronounce it until this BOLO was discovered)
  4. Yet with all of the above in place (essentially a hit put out on me per law enforcement) the BOLO states there is NO PC (probable cause) for arrest.  In addition, Battle Ground School District, where I am a respected high school teacher with no prior criminal record of any kind, was assured by the VPD in May of this year that I need not be put on administrative leave as I pose no direct threat to high school students or staff members in my building.

I hope this has adequately addressed the generalization underlined below in the previous email in which I stated:

“Lt. Creager et al, I am requesting the same police lineup, but let me be clear… This is not an FOIA request to be craftily delayed per movement to the bottom of an “installment” plan… The legality of which we are currently investigating. This is a request to meet said officers in person as a part of DUE PROCESS of law that I have been continuously and intentionally denied. Please arrange prior to 4 pm Friday.

Thank you.”

I further hope to have clearly outlined how and why I feel that I have been a victim of unlawful criminalization while being robbed of due process of law.

 

[Approved for redistribution]

powerful 06e18d4c-4315-4ca5-a479-d385cec28258-medium

Posted in Academia as Fraud, Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, Capitalism and Psycho-Sociopathy, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, FALSE FLAGS, Fascism in America, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Government Corruption, HISTORICAL REVISIONISM, Hubris and Braggadocio, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, Psyops, Social Systems Engineering Campaigns, U.S. Terrorism | 1 Comment

Everyday People Push Back Against Apparent Clark County and FBI Corruption

COURAGE twaincourage

Request for Police Lineup: V14-16534

2015-06-19 CCSO Records Response V14-16534

2015-06-24 CCSO records manager – Appeal to provide complete information

Dear Sgt. Hatley,

Attached is my formal appeal in which I request the CCSO records dept. to seek amendment to EPR V14-16534.

Hidden away is yet another electronic police report (EPR) that again fails to reference case number (RCN) V14-6772.
There is absolutely no reason whatsoever for V14-16534 with DOR of 10/24/2014 to be void of RCN V14-6772. In addition, this report is void of the digital image of said BOLO that the CCSO records dept. provided me a copy of on June 19, 2015.

This begs the question, does Officer Smarr know he had prepared this report? More succinctly, who prepared this report? It was not Officer Smarr who is allegedly closer to my age (50 yo). The VPO that briefly took me into custody on Oct 24, 2014 due to the false BOLO was significantly younger than me by approximately 10 – 15 years (35-40 yo). That being said, we feel it is necessary to identify Officer’s Smarr, Ruth and Weir out of a police lineup. That would seem most appropriate. After all, what has transpired against us are not some random acts of reporting errors as the VPD would want us to believe. These reporting gaffs are truly criminal acts that have violated our constitutional rights of equal protection and due process (see 14th Amendment of the US Constitution and Articles 1 & 3 of the Washington State Constitution).
Continue reading

Posted in Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, Bumper Sticker "Faith" in Bumper Sticker America, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CORRUPTION IN "HIGHER" EDUCATION, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Fascism in America, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Government Corruption, Legal System Corruption, Meme Warfare and Imperialism, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, U.S. CULTURE OF FEAR AND NARCISSISM, Vantucky Corruption and Inbredness, Whistleblowers | 9 Comments