Article 6 Section 2 U.S. Constitution Supremacy Clause:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Please note time of this posting October 25, 2013 7 am PST
Dear Mr. Ferguson,
Please regard this as an official submission to you not only as the Attorney General, the chief law enforcement officer in Washington State, but as an Officer of the Court and Member of the Washington State Bar, under the responsibilities of all public employees and citizens under
I write to you again to try again to try to stop real crimes and real harm to real people.
First of all, you need to take a very close look at AAG Colleen Warren and her interactions with me and my associates as I respectfully requested in my prior submissions. But this is URGENT. Here are my interactions with Ms Warren and those representing her. http://jimcraven10.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/clark-college-and-18-usc-article-i-chapter-13-parts-241-and-242/ and why I objected repeatedly to her inserting herself into this process. She has a clear agenda as well as contempt for basic due process but her intrigue today was over the top.
Today, Ms Warren told Mr. Dean Lookinghawk, who has been with me at all hearings with the Clark College administration and Robert Knight, the president, that as far as she was concerned my termination from employment will proceed and that the process is being followed contractually. The problem is that I have a meeting with Mr.,Knight, who I have asked to recuse himself for cause repeatedly, tomorrow (October 25, 2013 at 4pm to 5 pm) where he says he MAY decide to recommend my termination after 21 years at Clark College. Do you see any problem here? Last time, and it is all documented in the urls I sent that appear to have been intercepted by Ms Warren, my replacements were hired, my name kept on the teaching schedule to draw-in students (bait-and-switch fraud), BEFORE the one-hour hearing I got that was supposed to decide IF or IF NOT I would be teaching.