Clark College and 18 USC Article I Chapter 13 parts 241 and 242

Dear Ms Balliet:

Please forward this to Ms Warren and to Mr. McKenna as Ms Warren did not give me her card, email or phone number.

Dear Ms Warren:

This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter. I cannot call your opinions findings as “findings” are the result of investigations that are the result of all sides of an issue or issues being examined having their say and be able to confront accusers and accusations; and our brief conversation hardly constitutes any kind of participation or input on my part into your summary opinions that remain unanswered only because you never contacted me nor answered my take and reservations, and that of my friend Michael whose ethnicity and background you seemed interested in, on the brief conversation we had.

Documents Submitted to Judge Christine Pomeroy, Superior Court

Tab: Table of Contents of Documents Submitted to Honorable Judge Christine Pomeroy, Thurston County Superior Court

James M. Craven/Omahkohkiaaiipooyii

1. Faculty Lecture Series Notice, Clark College
   1. professional standing as an economist;
   2. service to Clark College;
   3. comparison with evidence of isolation and marginalization from professional responsibilities in: vetting new hires; curriculum design in economics; professional standards; vetting competence, pedagogy and mentoring of adjuncts in economics);
   4. hiring and vetting of adjunct instructors (some still have never even met) in economics by unqualified faculty summarily designated over repeated protests;

Reporting Crimes To Clark County Sheriff’s Office

——————————————————————————–

Subject: FW: Some Background Materials Sgt Trimble Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:31:57 -0800 From: JCraven@clark.edu To: omahkohkiaayo@hotmail.com

——————————————————————————–

From: Craven, Jim Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:39 AM To: ‘dave.trimble@clark.wa.gov’ Subject: Some Background Materials

Dear Sgt. Trimble:

I was referred to your office and given your direct phone number by Sgt. Rob Rousseau (?) of the WSP who told me that it is protocol that my complaint  go to the Clark County Sheriff’s Office first.

First of all, let me say that I am fully aware that to attempt to misuse State resources, to attempt to launch a frivolous and malicious criminal complaint for personal reasons, or to lie to a law enforcement officer in the course of an investigation or to launch an investigation is not only morally wrong, but is also a gross misdemeanor under some RCWs and  involves felonies under other RCWs.

Some More Background on Clark College

Here are some more documents, not written by me, that speak to the climate that exists at Clark College as well as on the quality of vetting, and quality of some individuals hired as adjunct instructors, at Clark College. Any real educator understands the need for proper vetting and welcomes teaching in an environment where credentials are fairly but thoroughly evaluated as only in such an environment are the rights and needs of the students respected and put first. Only poseurs and those unsure of their own credentials and abilities need fear formal vetting processes as they are also protected by them once they are hired and show their merit in and out of the classroom.

Reporting Felony Crimes to Clark County Prosecutors

Reporting Felony Crimes to Clark County Prosecutors

---

From: omahkohkiaayo@hotmail.com
To: scott.jackson@clark.wa.gov
Subject: Response to phone message from your office
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:58:08 -0800

Dear Mr. Jackson:

I have given more than sufficient documentation, in the words of others, previously unknown and unsolicited by me, in official documents and timelines, and I have new evidence from a recent hearing with the president of Clark College Bob Knight on tape, that indicates perjury and more attempted cover-up of it; plus a brief submitted by the AG’s office in rebuttal to an appeal on an ESD matter that is riddled with internally contradictory representations (thus each becomes a misrepresentation), outright and provable falsehoods, followed with more in oral submission (all of which will be referred to the Washington State Bar and U.S. Attorney’s Office under 18 USC Article I Chapter 13, Parts 241, 242) that caused two judicial decisions that were internally self-impeaching on their face; and will be explored further in other venues both civil and criminal if my assertions prove to be correct. Further, you have documents that I am a Whistleblower (allegations sustained) on several issues, have submitted documents prior to repeated requests for an interview, to Detective Sgt Dave Trimble of the Clark Sheriff’s Department, Detective Sgt Rob Rousseau of the WSP, Detective Sgt Harari (?) of the Clark Sheriff, who advised me to go to the AG, then to the AG’s office, where one AAG, Jody Campbell, told me to take it to the AG directly, while another AAG Coleen Warren, whose letters to her you have, referred me to your office where the person taking intake, directed me to your office, after hearing my representations as to what I propose to bring. I have also been in contact with Supervisory Special Agent Kevin Saito of the Seattle FBI over several years on matters related to serial harassment and shutting down my computer with cyber-attacks of vile porn to patterns of serial denial of due process.

Review of Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go To Work by Paul Babiak and Robert Hare

Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work by Dr. Paul Babiak and Dr. Robert
Hare, Regan Books, N.Y. 2006

A Review by
James M. Craven/Omahkohkiaayo i’poyi

A Review by
James M. Craven/Omahkohkiaayo i’poyi

I cannot recommend enough, to enough people, the book “Snakes in Suits: When
Psychopaths Go to Work by Paul Babiak and Robert Hare. These authors, both highly
qualified on the subject of psychopathy, walk us through, and so richly illustrate, not
only with cutting-edge theory and research, but also vivid case studies, the “ABCs” of Psychopathy: No Anxiety; No Bonds; No Conscience. They also illustrate how the
corporate world is increasingly a “target rich” environment for psychopaths. By the term
“corporate world”, they mean not only corporations, but other entities and institutions we
increasingly find corporatized: politico-legal, sociocultural, educational, religious, etc..

As Robert Hare, inventor of the PCL-SV and PCL-R Checklists for Psychopathy put it:

“I always said that if I wasn’t studying psychopaths in prison, I’d do so at the
Stock Exchange.”

OPEN LETTER FOR MY STUDENTS AND ALL CLARK COLLEGE STUDENTS

OPEN LETTER FOR MY STUDENTS AND ALL CLARK COLLEGE STUDENTS

By Jim Craven/Omahkohkiaaiipooyii

Professor and Department Head, Economics 

“ First-rate seeks to hire first-rate because part of the substance of first-rate, is in  recognizing, valuing and seeking, rather than fearing, or envying or feeling threatened by, first-rate in others. Second-rate seeks and hires third and fourth-rate so that it looks good in comparison; third and fourth-rate goes on to seek fifth and sixth-rate so they look good; and mediocrity metastasizes like a cancer.” (Homer H. Craven Jr. (1925-1991)

From a former student who signed up to be taught specifically by me and who was induced to do so as my name was still listed on the course schedule even during and after while my replacements were lined up which was BEFORE I and my union representatives were notified of possible pending discipline of one year off without pay. This was all BEFORE the scheduled one-hour hearing on September 26^th, 2011, the first day of classes, to determine, the question that clearly had been answered prior to the hearing: if or if not I would be off for one year without pay starting in Winter 2012 (if the question was open pending my responses, then why take me out of the classroom for Fall 2011, depriving students of the most senior and experienced teacher of economics for whom many had signed up specifically and/or  leave my name on the course schedule while students were still registering?)

At Clark College, it is like Alice in Wonderland:

From Lewis Carroll’s Alice Through the Looking Glass:

Interview on Expert Witness Radio with Mike Levine

http://expertwitnessradio.org/site/geronimo/

 

 

The Faces Behind the Masks of Imperialism

Obama: Imperialism With a New Mask

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

mindmanipulationApol_15A1

The privilege of opening the first trial in history for crimes against the peace of the world imposes a grave responsibility. The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant, and so devastating that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored because it cannot survive their being repeated… We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our own lips as well. We must summon such detachment and intellectual integrity to our task that this trial will commend itself to posterity as fulfilling humanity…
(Opening address at the first Nuremberg Trial by Justice Robert H. Jackson, Representative and Chief of Counsel for the United States of America)

 
-THE INTERRELATED PREDICATES AND PRECEDENTS OF JUST WAR AND NUREMBERG

-
In the first Nuremberg Trial, 22 war criminals went on trial of whom 12 were hanged. They were all charged with varying levels of responsibility for five interrelated, concomitant and mutually supporting crimes:
-
a) Launching and Waging Aggressive and Illegal War; which implies–and if proved supports a charge of:
-
b) Conspiracy to Launch and Wage Aggressive Illegal War (since no parties go to war without planning and giving asserted reasons );
-
c) Crimes Against Peace (which all illegal wars, launched and waged on the basis of illegal conspiracy, imply and entail, per se):
-
d) Crimes Against Humanity (which charges a, b, c, imply and entail per se by virtue of the known horrors and effects of war) and:
-
e) War Crimes (no such right of “self-defense” or “necessary measures” by those guilty of charges a, b, c, d, ).

Principles of “Just War (JW):

Principle I: JUST CAUSE: (AD BELLUM)

Principle II: GROSS FORMAL MORAL GUILT ON ONE SIDE (AD BELLUM)

Principle III: UNDOUBTED KNOWLEDGE OF GUILT (AD BELLUM)

Principle IV: WAR CAN ONLY BE CONDUCTED BY A COMPETENT, POLITICALLY LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY IN CHARGE OF THE RESPONSE TO PUBLIC ORDER BEING DISTURBED (AD BELLUM)

Principle V: RIGHT INTENTIONS FREE OF REVENGE, BLOODLUST, And HIDDEN GEOSTRATEGIC AGENDA AND STRICTLY CONFINED TO THE GOALS CONNECTED WITH THE “JUST CAUSES” FOR WAR. (AD BELLUM)

Principle VI: WAR SHOULD ONLY BE DECLARED WHEN EVERY MEANS TO PREVENT IT HAVE BEEN EXPLORED, TRIED AND HAVE FAILED. (AD BELLUM)

-
Principle VII: JUSTICE MUST FAVOR THE SIDE OF THE OFFENDED NATION BUT NO NATION HAS ABSOLUTE JUSTICE ON ITS SIDE (AD BELLUM)

Principle VIII: THE INTENDED AND LIKELY “BENEFITS” OF WAR IN TERMS OF WRONGS THAT ARE STOPPED AND “PUBLIC ORDER” RESTORED MUST LIKELY OUTWEIGH THE LIKELY COSTS OF THE WAR IN TERMS OF SUFFERING AND DESTRUCTION. (AD BELLUM)

Principle IX: THERE MUST BE A GROUNDED AND REASONABLE PROSPECT OR HOPE FOR SUCCESS (AD BELLUM)

Principle X: THE LIKELY EFFECTS OF THE METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS OF WAR AS MEASURED IN LIKELY DEATH AND SUFFERING MUST NOT BE GREATER THAN THE WRONGS BEING STOPPED AND/OR GOOD BEING ESTABLISHED. (AD BELLUM AND IN BELLO)

Principle XI: CIVILIANS AND NON-COMBATANTS (Those not intentionally, directly and materially engaged in support of combatants) MUST BE DIFFERENTIATED FROM COMBATANTS AND NO INTENTIONAL FORCE IS TO BE DIRECTED AGAINST THEM. (Jus in Bello)

 Originally, some genius named the original invasion of Iraq in 2003 as Operation Iraqi Liberation with uniform patches that read OIL. The operation was renamed Operation Iraqi Freedom and all US Forces were ordered to turn over all OIL uniform patches.