When Will the Decent People in Vancouver Stand up to the Corruption in Clark County?

power 29c02e88-4a48-4456-89a6-48eb08b48c97-medium

http://1believe2obey3love4trust.blogspot.com/p/hmmmmmm.html

WOW, OUT OF THE OFFICE UNTIL MAY 20th?  2016?

THIS VPD RESPONSED  REQUIRES A NEWS RELEASE ALL OF ITS OWN.

KID YOU NOT!    WHO DO YOU, OR ANYONE IN YOUR GROUP KNOW IN THE NEWS INDUSTRY WHO WOULD LIKE TO RUN THIS BIT OF

 VPD EVASIVE ACTIONS, APPARENTLY TO AVOID A FOIA REQUEST.

 

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Traci Eccles <eccles.traci@gmail.com> wrote:

Well Sgt. Hatley…

Apparently Lt. Creager will be out of the office until May 20th?  is that 2016?  You received a copy of my request, but since I have only directed these questions to the VPD and not the City Attorneys Office, I am touching base with you to see if I should forward these questions elsewhere.  Thanks!

 

———- Forwarded message ———- From: Creager, Scott <Scott.Creager@cityofvancouver.us> Date: Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:13 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Lt. Creager: IMPORTANT To: Traci Eccles <eccles.traci@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until at least May 20th. I will respond to any e-mails shortly after my return.

If you need immediate assistance, please contact Sergeant Kevin Hatley at kevin.hatley@cityofvancouver.us or 487-7471.

My advice Traci, is thusly:   VPD  Lt. Scott Creager willful evasion/avoidance of responding to those certain FOIAs you have submitted, appears to be a deliberate act  on non-compliance in respect to those certain FOIAs, and to other FOIAs, which you have been submitting to VPD Lt. Creager.

Accordingly, my recommendation is that you file a COMPLAINT ASAP with the
U.S. Justice Dept., regarding this willful evasion/avoidance of VPD Lt. Scott Creager’s non-compliance with those certain FOIAS. File the FOIA COMPLAINT ASAP with the US Justice Dept. NOW! cc: Washington State AG.
Moreover, if there are other similar willfull evasions/avoidances of VPDs non-complaince with other FOIAs, my advice is that you file a COMPLAINT ASAP  with the U.s. Justice Dept, regarding this willful evasion/avoidance of VPD Lt. Scott Creager’s non-compliance, including the non-complaince of VPD Lt. Scott Creager’s  subordinates, with those certain FOIAS; and/or any other VPD FOIA was not responded to by VPD.
File the FOIA COMPLAINT ASAP with the US  Justice Dept. NOW!

cc: Washington State AG.
Same action should be considered if there are similar willful evasions/avoidances of Clark County’s Judical System with FOIAS that have not been responded to


1. in a timely manner;
2. lack of any response;
3. or resonse has been a willful evasion/avoidance by Clark County’s Judicial System.


File the FOIA  COMPLAINT ASAP with the US  Justice Dept. NOW!
cc: Washington State AG.


Any FOIA requests that have been willfully evaded and/or avoided by any Judicial System in Washington State, that have not been responded to
1. in a timely manner;
2. lack of any response;
3. or resonse has been a willful evasion/avoidance by that certain Judicial System in Washington State.


File the FOIA  COMPLAINT ASAP with the US  Justice Dept. NOW!

cc: Washington State AG.
Need assistance with this matter, let me know.
Regards, Judy

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Traci Eccles <eccles.traci@gmail.com> wrote:

Lt. Creager,

Based on your response from yesterday, I can only surmise that you habitually fail to read my emails past the first line or two. I will make this easy… and let’s just call it an official FOIA request:


1.  What training (if any) do law enforcement investigators with the VPD receive regarding their duty under Brady v. Maryland to notify the prosecutor of any potential exculpatory information discovered during an investigation?
2.  What policy does the VPD enforce from their departmental regulations requiring officers to disclose exculpatory evidence.  What penalties may result from non-compliance (provided there is such a policy enforced)?
Thank you.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Creager, Scott <Scott.Creager@cityofvancouver.us> wrote:
Dear Ms Eccles,

Unfortunately the e-mail you sent to me this morning contained no attachments, just the text below your explanation.  The purpose for my question to you was to establish when we received this request.  Fortunately Ms McJilton was able to quicky respond to both of us with the necessary information.  Here is a copy of the e-mail.

Scott Creager| Lieutenant
Valor, Professionalism, Duty
CITY OF VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON
Vancouver Police Department/Headquarters
W:(360) 487-7501

Scott.creager@cityofvancouver.us/      http://www.cityofvancouver.us
NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE: This e-mail account is public domain. Any correspondence from or to this e-mail account may be a public record. Accordingly, this e-mail, in whole or in part may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56, regardless of any claim of confidentiality or privilege asserted by an external

From: Traci Eccles [mailto:eccles.traci@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:21 PM
To: Creager, Scott
Subject: Lt. Creager: IMPORTANT

Lt. Creager,

In reading your last email, it occurs to me that perhaps you are not taking the time to read beyond the introduction of my correspondences (if that).  Your question regarding this morning’sFOIA PUBLIC DISCLOSURE REQUEST was unnecessary as I copied the request to the email sent to you, and I clearly stated that in the email. This would certainly explain the absence of any response from you regarding my request for information in an email dated July 15th and titled “Substantive due process issue”… I am still awaiting the response on that one.  Might I suggest you take a moment to read it now?

In the same category of concern, I have a few follow up questions regarding VPD policies and procedures regarding the altering and/or “back filling” of police reports after they have been stamped into record by the CCSO.  And no, I am not talking about supplemental reports… I am talking about multiple different versions of originals.

In exercising our rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Guy and I have discovered something important to our vindication, as well as that of Garrett Smith:  The truth will be revealed… if not through the ethical channels we had been hoping for, definitely through the barrage of inconsistency and outright falsification that has become the unavoidable by-product of repeated attempts on the part of various city and county entities to cover up the kind of egregious misconduct that has put us all in this position in the first place.

I will continue to wait for an informed response from you regarding my July 15th email Lt. Creager.  Thank you.

Traci Eccles, citizen of Clark County, Vancouver, WA

. Hatley,

Thank you for the detailed explanation regarding the reference case number (RCN). It’s obvious the failure to reference case number, V14-6772, as the RCN for V14-16534 was intentional. Officer Smarr, the alleged arresting officer, was able to hide the V14-16534 report as it was finally revealed on June 19, 2015 after multiple PDR’s since November 2014.

Brief Timeline:

May 7, 2014 V14-6772 False arrest – no probable cause unfounded and non existent -exonerated;  unlawful seizure of iPhone – violation of VPD evidence procedures, violations of civil rights.
PDR Received January 24, 2015

May 30, 2014 V14-6772 Failure to obtain authorization to issue an unlawful order – false BOLO
May 30, 2014 V14-6772 Failure to create supplemental electronic report for the alleged declaration of probable cause for arrest for misdemeanor cyberstalking with citation for arrest.
PDR Received April 22, 2015

Oct 24, 2014 V14-16534 False arrest – unauthorized BOLO for misdemeanor cyberstalking (V14-6772) – unfounded and dismissed, violation of VPD & CCSO BOLO procedures.
PDR Received June 19, 2015

Scoreboard:
May 7, 2014 false arrest, probable cause unfounded as it did not existent – exonerated  May 12, 2014
May 7, 2014 unlawful seizure of iPhone, failed to follow evidence handling procedures – adversely impact dept.’s image
May 30, 2014 knowingly issue an unauthorized and unlawful order – issuance of BOLO stated probable cause for misdemeanor citation for arrest; no probable cause or citation for arrest has been discovered via multiple public records requests.

Oct 24, 2014 false arrest per May 30, 2014 unauthorized & unlawful order – false BOLO

Nov 4, 2014 – Sgt Andy Hamlin issued BOLO based upon 3rd party hearsay from a meeting that never occurred stating Bini & Eccles had made death threats about a deputy prosecuting attorney, Jennifer Nugent, in a criminal case yet to be tried.

March 25, 2015 Aldridge discloses false, unredacted non-conviction criminal data into public record. The information above that has already been refuted.

April 2, 2015 – Sgt. Andy Hamlin escalates the Nov 4, 2014 BOLO to include all Law Enforcement Agencies in Clark County.

Over the last 15 months, the retaliation identified in the above timeline of events by Det. Aldridge and Sgt. Hamlin are clearly an abuse of authority used to intimidate defense witness and potential defense witness as well as place said defense witnesses in harm’s way.

RE: V14-6772 The faux investigation aka the attempted criminalization of Guido A. Bini by VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge and authorized by her immediate supervisor, Sgt. Andy Hamlin have violated the following VPD police & procedures. This list is by no means conclusive as the VPD may find additional violations not identified by the complainant.

Multiple violations of VPD Policy & Procedures:
Offense Class 5 d. Failure to comply with policies, orders, regulations when such violations involves the misuse or abuse of authority, or an ethical offense and/or creates a clear, serious adverse impact on public safety or the professional image of the dept. Release of FALSE non-conviction, unredacted criminal data into public records – March 25, 2015 (Bini & Eccles)

Offense Class 6 a. Failure to reply truthfully to any question or request for information in any investigation, hearing or procedure – 02/27/2014 depositions, when asked, Det. Aldridge stated she had no special training. However, during the 11/24/2014 evidentiary hearing (13-1-01035-6), Det. Aldridge Stated she was Cellbrite certified to use technology she had available at her desk to access smart phone devices. Det. Aldridge stated she had difficulty obtaining forensic evidence of J. Garrett Smith’s iPhone on July 15-16, 2013 and required the assistance of “Bruce” from the DECU to complete the downloading of all content on said iPhone. She may have destroyed well over 3,000 emails that were on said iPhone and are now missing from evidence.

If certified, Det. Aldridge failed to answer truthfully during the Feb 27, 2014 deposition.
If not certified, Det. Aldridge failed to answer truthfully during Nov 24, 2014 evidentiary hearing.
Which is it?

Offense Class 7b. Commission of a felony
Offense Class 4g. Through carelessness or omission creating or causing to be created a false, inaccurate, or misleading departmental report or record
The discovery of a fictitious police report and the creation of evidence that assisted with a conspiracy to falsely imprison and convict a man for a crime he did not commit. V13-8172 Evidence Report 02/17/2014 – Counterfeit Wisconsin Driver’s License. This alone brings into question the adverse impact upon the professional image of the dept. as both the Camas PD and Skamania County Sheriff’s Office are now implicated.

Lastly, if the electronic police reports can not be edited and something needed to be added, then obviously a later incident would not be referenced after the report’s print date. Take a closer look at V14-16534 and you will find there is an example in the report narrative on Oct 27, 2014 after the report date of Oct 24, 2014. We have multiple examples of incidents being reported after the report’s print date. There will be a detailed response that will identify each incident in numerous reports that were reported after the report’s print date. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,

Guy Bini


From: Kevin.Hatley@cityofvancouver.us
To: bini.guy@outlook.com
Subject: RE: Appeal to amend V14-16534
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:29:45 +0000

Good afternoon, Mr. Bini,

I will need to ask our case management sergeant to see if that is even possible. Almost all of the agencies in the greater Portland area recently switched to a new report system and I’m not certain how our old system’s reports are being connected or uploaded. I do know the old system, which is the system under which V13-8172 and V14-6772 were written, can no longer be used to author reports at all, so I believe there is no longer a way to update information into those reports.

This might be a little long-winded but I’m going to try and explain some of the practical issues with that reporting system. The RCN box in the old report system was not a mandatory field (since most reports are not related to other investigations) and typically officers didn’t use it at all. Some used it to link the original reports (unless there was a supplemental report that provided information which related a case to another case at a later time). More often than not officers referred to associated or related reports in their narrative because you couldn’t conduct a search for the RCN box. For example, if I had a report number to search for, such as V14-6772, and I saw the RCN was completed in one of the reports for V13-8172, I would know that the whole investigation was linked by whomever authored the report that linked them. Conversely, V13-8172 would never show it was linked to V14-6772 unless someone authored a new supplemental report for V13-8172 to document the link. I don’t think it actually physically links them at all; I believe it’s just a text box for information but I’ll check on that too.

That program didn’t have backwards compatibility for linking information either. You may have seen instances where a person’s personal identifiers were in one report but didn’t appear in another report or at least not all of them. It’s because all fields were manually completed and nothing could be imported, so if it wasn’t a mandatory field it often wasn’t filled in; particularly in instances where one officer was authoring multiple reports under the same report number. There was one exception to that, at that was only for a supplemental report. Some fields, such as a name or address, could be imported into a supplemental report from the other reports written under that case number but it was very limited (even phone numbers couldn’t be imported even though addresses could). That being said, some officers were more diligent about it than others, but once it’s in one report, we would presume they’re all linked unless the narrative told us otherwise.

Additionally, once a report was approved by a supervisor in that system, it couldn’t be edited for content at all (unless either the case management people or other program administrators have that ability). So if an officer wrote a report and it was approved and they didn’t fill in the RCN but it needed to be added, then a whole new supplemental report would have to be written and only then could they fill in the RCN for information (and explain why they wrote the new report to add the RCN).

I apologize for the long reply but I will check with the case management sergeant and let you know what they say. I don’t believe the CCSO records personnel have the authority to change a VPD report.

Regards,

Kevin Hatley | Sergeant

Professional Standards Unit

Vancouver Police Department

605 E. Evergreen Blvd

Vancouver, WA 98661

Desk: 360.487.7471

From: Guy Bini [mailto:bini.guy@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 9:15 AM
To: Hatley, Kevin
Cc: Traci Eccles; Judy McDonald; Kent Steinmetz; Jamie Jackson
Subject: FW: Appeal to amend V14-16534

Sgt. Hatley,

Attached is an appeal to amend V14-16534 sent to the CCSO requesting that V14-6772 be included as the RCN.

This brings into question the RCN for V14-6772. V13-8172 was the original RCN as identified on the 5/7/2014 report. Since then, V13-8172 has gone missing from every other supplemental report related to V14-6772.

Which VPD personnel do I send an appeal to amend V14-6772 to include the reference case number V13-8172?

Please advise. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Guido A. Bini

From: bini.guy@outlook.com
To: sheriff@clark.wa.gov
CC: eccles.traci@gmail.com; butnottoohot@hotmail.com; kentsteinmetz@msn.com; jmcdonald.macdonald@gmail.com; bonnieatcoast@peak.org; larsstill@peak.org; fred@sgrealtyinc.com; jrs1040@yahoo.com
Subject: Appeal to amend V14-16534
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:50:22 -0700

To: CCSO Records Manager
Attached is the formal request of appeal to amend V14-16534.
The original letter with wet ink signature has been deposited with the USPS and should arrive early next week.

Please feel free to contact me via email at bini.guy@outlook.com should you have any further questions.
Sincerely,

Guido “Guy” Bini
(360) 907-3841

html { font-family: “Color Emoji”, “Calibri”, “Segoe UI”, “Meiryo”, “Microsoft YaHei UI”, “Microsoft JhengHei UI”, “Malgun Gothic”, “sans-serif”; }

July 27, 2015

Chief Lackey,

Thank you for providing the four pages of orphan documents to CPD report, C12-3079. Obviously, the orphan documents are NOT a Skamania County Sheriff’s Office report of the alleged incident that was identified in EPR C12-3079, a report that became the basis for VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge’s probable cause report in the State’s faux Criminal Impersonation case Vs John Garrett Smith, 13-1-01062-3. After 19 months, this charge was dropped promptly by the DVPC once Garrett Smith obtained counsel outside of Clark County in January 2015. The bogus Criminal Impersonation charge was one of many tactics used to keep Garrett Smith unlawfully imprisoned in the Clark County jail until he was finally convicted 18 months later of Attempted Murder II and Assault II, both of which are crimes he did not commit.

As you can see, the supplemental report dated 02/26/2014 was unnecessary and it begs the question: Why did Officer Smith need to create a 1 page report that summarized his original report dated 12/15/2012? Is this standard procedure? Of the dozens of EPRs that I have read, I have not found another supplemental report that regurgitated information like the 02/26/2014 supplement. There appears to be no justification for the 2/26 supplement.

When did Officer Jeff Smith retire? The handwritten signature of the approving officer, D. Norcross, appears on the 2/26/2014 supplemental report.

Sir, your department is now neck deep in a conspiracy in which VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge and others framed John Garrett Smith for Attempted Murder II. There is another version of the 12/15/2012 incident, one that describes Officers Smith and Robison responding to a report of a girl’s bicycle that was found on the Lacamas Lake Trail with a pair of panties nearby. Oddly enough, the story of the found bike failed to be mentioned in the 12/15/2012 Camas report that Detective Aldridge used as the basis for filing her probable cause report of Criminal Impersonation against John Garrett Smith on June 5, 2013. VPO Det. Aldridge has already proven herself to be a fraud in this matter now that it has been discovered she submitted the “Counterfeit Wisconsin ID” into evidence via the 2/17/2014 supplemental report. Given the set circumstances surrounding the false reports involving Aldridge and the CPD and the VPD, it stands to reason that the questionable supplemental Camas report dated 2/26/2014 is part of this fraud.

Chief Lackey, you challenged me to find any wrongdoing with a Camas Police Officer. If I did, then you encouraged me to file a report. Well, sir, all I have to offer you at this time is circumstantial evidence in spite of attempts to cover up wrongdoing by both agencies. Det. Aldridge’s fabricated claims against John Garrett Smith are falling apart in real time. I’m telling you this because I appreciated the prompt and professional manner in which you replied to the July 16 email.
At this time, it would appear that the CPD records clerk, Julie Norcross, who completed the April 24, 2014 public disclosure request, has played a pivotal role in promoting the fraudulent police reports. Camas EPR C12-3079 contains verifiably false information such as the non-existent SCSO report as well as the omission of the story of the girl’s bike. Besides State’s “Brady Cop” list, Officer D. Norcross shares the same last name as Julie Norcross. The appearance of the same last name of two people that authorized these reports, one of which is a “Brady Cop”, does not inspire confidence in these reports.

The story of John Garrett Smith’s false conviction is finally beginning to gain momentum; a story intent on exposing the truth and the bad actors. Which side of this travesty will the Camas PD fall on? The side that helped to frame innocent man that continues to perpetuate a lie? Or one that comes to the rescue the same innocent man with autism? Chief Lackey, you have the power to investigate. Please investigate CPD report C12-3079 and its supplements.

Sincerely,
Guido A. Bini
Concerned citizen and resident of Vancouver, WA

On July 19th, John Garrett Smith spent his birthday in prison for the 3rd year in a row.  On June 3rd, 2013, he was unnecessary and tragically ripped from the lives of his four young boys; two still in school, and two who are now young adults. Garrett was falsely accused, maliciously prosecuted and wrongfully convicted of crimes he did not commit. 

 
The suppressed evidence, now being provided through a series of posts on the blog “Garrett’s Voice” is being exposed for the sole purpose of vindicating a man who is not only innocent beyond a “reasonable doubt”… he is innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt. (Click link below)
 
**Important note of caution to family and friends of John Garrett Smith: Information revealed here was kept hidden by prosecution and defense counsel prior to this time.  It may cause additional shock & upset to those who are close to the defendant.
 
July 27, 2015

Chief Lackey,

Thank you for providing the four pages of orphan documents to CPD report, C12-3079. Obviously, the orphan documents are NOT a Skamania County Sheriff’s Office report of the alleged incident that was identified in EPR C12-3079, a report that became the basis for VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge’s probable cause report in the State’s faux Criminal Impersonation case Vs John Garrett Smith, 13-1-01062-3. After 19 months, this charge was dropped promptly by the DVPC once Garrett Smith obtained counsel outside of Clark County in January 2015. The bogus Criminal Impersonation charge was one of many tactics used to keep Garrett Smith unlawfully imprisoned in the Clark County jail until he was finally convicted 18 months later of Attempted Murder II and Assault II, both of which are crimes he did not commit.

As you can see, the supplemental report dated 02/26/2014 was unnecessary and it begs the question: Why did Officer Smith need to create a 1 page report that summarized his original report dated 12/15/2012? Is this standard procedure? Of the dozens of EPRs that I have read, I have not found another supplemental report that regurgitated information like the 02/26/2014 supplement. There appears to be no justification for the 2/26 supplement.

When did Officer Jeff Smith retire? The handwritten signature of the approving officer, D. Norcross, appears on the 2/26/2014 supplemental report.

Sir, your department is now neck deep in a conspiracy in which VPO Det. Sandra Aldridge and others framed John Garrett Smith for Attempted Murder II. There is another version of the 12/15/2012 incident, one that describes Officers Smith and Robison responding to a report of a girl’s bicycle that was found on the Lacamas Lake Trail with a pair of panties nearby. Oddly enough, the story of the found bike failed to be mentioned in the 12/15/2012 Camas report that Detective Aldridge used as the basis for filing her probable cause report of Criminal Impersonation against John Garrett Smith on June 5, 2013. VPO Det. Aldridge has already proven herself to be a fraud in this matter now that it has been discovered she submitted the “Counterfeit Wisconsin ID” into evidence via the 2/17/2014 supplemental report. Given the set circumstances surrounding the false reports involving Aldridge and the CPD and the VPD, it stands to reason that the questionable supplemental Camas report dated 2/26/2014 is part of this fraud.

Chief Lackey, you challenged me to find any wrongdoing with a Camas Police Officer. If I did, then you encouraged me to file a report. Well, sir, all I have to offer you at this time is circumstantial evidence in spite of attempts to cover up wrongdoing by both agencies. Det. Aldridge’s fabricated claims against John Garrett Smith are falling apart in real time. I’m telling you this because I appreciated the prompt and professional manner in which you replied to the July 16 email.
At this time, it would appear that the CPD records clerk, Julie Norcross, who completed the April 24, 2014 public disclosure request, has played a pivotal role in promoting the fraudulent police reports. Camas EPR C12-3079 contains verifiably false information such as the non-existent SCSO report as well as the omission of the story of the girl’s bike. Besides State’s “Brady Cop” list, Officer D. Norcross shares the same last name as Julie Norcross. The appearance of the same last name of two people that authorized these reports, one of which is a “Brady Cop”, does not inspire confidence in these reports.

The story of John Garrett Smith’s false conviction is finally beginning to gain momentum; a story intent on exposing the truth and the bad actors. Which side of this travesty will the Camas PD fall on? The side that helped to frame innocent man that continues to perpetuate a lie? Or one that comes to the rescue the same innocent man with autism? Chief Lackey, you have the power to investigate. Please investigate CPD report C12-3079 and its supplements.

Sincerely,


Guido A. Bini
Concerned citizen and resident of Vancouver, WA

Advertisements

About jimcraven10

About jimcraven10 1. Citizenship: Blackfoot, U.S. and Canadian; 2. Position: tenured Professor of Economics and Geography; Dept. Head, Economics; 3. Teaching, Consulting and Research experience: approx 40 + years all levels high school to post-doctoral U.S. Canada, Europe, China, India, Puerto Rico and parts of E. Asia; 4. Work past and present: U.S. Army 1963-66; Member: Veterans for Peace; former VVAW; Veterans for 9-11 Truth; Scholars for 9-11 Truth; Pilots for 9-11 Truth; World Association for Political Economy; Editorial Board International Critical Thought; 4.. U.S. Commercial-Instrument Pilot ; FAA Licensed Ground Instructor (Basic, Advanced, Instrument and Simulators); 5. Research Areas and Publications: International law (on genocide, rights of nations, war and war crimes); Imperialism (nature, history, logic, trajectories, mechanisms and effects); Economic Geography (time and space modeling in political economy; globalization--logic and effects; Political Economy and Geography of Imperialism); Indigenous versus non-Indigenous Law; Political Economy of Socialism and Socialist Construction; 6. Member, Editorial Board, "International Critical Thought" published by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; International Advisory Board and Columnist 4th Media Group, http://www.4thMedia.org (Beijing); 7. Other Websites publications at http://www.aradicalblackfoot.blogspot.com; wwwthesixthestate.blogspot.com;https://jimcraven10.wordpress.com; 8.Biography available in: Marquis Who’s Who: in the World (16th-18th; 20th; 22nd -31st (2014) Editions); Who’s Who in America (51st-61st;63rd-68th(2014) Editions); Who’s Who in the West (24th- 27th Editions);Who’s Who in Science and Engineering (3rd to 6th, 8th, 11th (2011-2012) Editions); Who’s Who in Finance and Industry (29th to 37th Editions); Who’s Who in American Education (6th Edition). ------------------- There are times when you have to obey a call which is the highest of all, i.e. the voice of conscience even though such obedience may cost many a bitter tear, and even more, separation from friends, from family, from the state, to which you may belong, from all that you have held as dear as life itself. For this obedience is the law of our being. ~ Mahatma Gandhi
This entry was posted in Behind the Masks of the Democratic Party, Clark College, CLARK COLLEGE: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON SERIOUS ISSUES, Conspiracy against Rights and under Color of Law, Corruption and Intrigue in Government, CorruptWA, courage and treachery in government, Faces of Fascism, Fascism in America, FBI-DOJ CORRUPTION, FOUNDATIONS OF FASCISM IN AMERICA, Legal System Corruption, MSM Mainstream Media Sycophancy, NATIONAL SECURITY-SURVEILLANCE STATE, Psychopathic Management, Psychopaths and Sociopaths in Politics, Psychopaths in Management, Psyops, U.S. CULTURE OF FEAR AND NARCISSISM, Vantucky Corruption and Inbredness, Whistleblowers. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s